From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Marcel Apfelbaum" <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] tests/functional: skip test if QEMU_TEST_QEMU_BINARY is not set
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 09:50:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z8GG_dcCqo8_X4RR@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a90b4f1f-8581-4647-9145-e52fc14ac604@redhat.com>
On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 10:01:45AM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 05/02/2025 16.59, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > If QEMU_TEST_QEMU_BINARY is not set we currently assert in the setUp
> > function, resulting in a big traceback:
> >
> > TAP version 13
> > Traceback (most recent call last):
> > File "/var/home/berrange/src/virt/qemu/tests/functional/qemu_test/testcase.py", line 280, in setUp
> > super().setUp('qemu-system-')
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > File "/var/home/berrange/src/virt/qemu/tests/functional/qemu_test/testcase.py", line 196, in setUp
> > self.assertIsNotNone(self.qemu_bin, 'QEMU_TEST_QEMU_BINARY must be set')
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > AssertionError: unexpectedly None : QEMU_TEST_QEMU_BINARY must be set
> >
> > not ok 1 test_ppc_405.Ppc405Machine.test_ppc_ref405ep
> > 1..1
> >
> > For every other test pre-requisite that's missing we will mark the test
> > as skipped. This does the same for missing QEMU_TEST_QEMU_BINARY, such
> > that we get
> >
> > TAP version 13
> > ok 1 test_x86_64_kvm_xen.KVMXenGuest.test_kvm_xen_guest # SKIP QEMU_TEST_QEMU_BINARY env variable is not set
> > ok 2 test_x86_64_kvm_xen.KVMXenGuest.test_kvm_xen_guest_noapic_nomsi # SKIP QEMU_TEST_QEMU_BINARY env variable is not set
> > ok 3 test_x86_64_kvm_xen.KVMXenGuest.test_kvm_xen_guest_nomsi # SKIP QEMU_TEST_QEMU_BINARY env variable is not set
> > ok 4 test_x86_64_kvm_xen.KVMXenGuest.test_kvm_xen_guest_novector # SKIP QEMU_TEST_QEMU_BINARY env variable is not set
> > ok 5 test_x86_64_kvm_xen.KVMXenGuest.test_kvm_xen_guest_novector_noapic # SKIP QEMU_TEST_QEMU_BINARY env variable is not set
> > ok 6 test_x86_64_kvm_xen.KVMXenGuest.test_kvm_xen_guest_novector_nomsi # SKIP QEMU_TEST_QEMU_BINARY env variable is not set
> > ok 7 test_x86_64_kvm_xen.KVMXenGuest.test_kvm_xen_guest_vapic # SKIP QEMU_TEST_QEMU_BINARY env variable is not set
> > 1..7
>
> Not sure whether this is the right approach, since a missing
> QEMU_TEST_QEMU_BINARY is a real error, and if we just skip, then the problem
> might go unnoticed if the user does not look closely.
>
> But to ease the situation: We could maybe add some auto-detection logic that
> tries to guess the right qemu-system-$TARGET by looking at the file name of
> the test and/or the test function name? We already encode the target
> architecture in most of these... WDYT?
When the user provides a binary, a single binary applies to all tests,
so tests that don't match the binary get skipped. I think it would be
a bit wierd to auto-select a different binary per test.
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-28 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-05 15:59 [PATCH 0/5] tests/functional: a few misc cleanups and fixes Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-02-05 15:59 ` [PATCH 1/5] tests/functional: skip test if QEMU_TEST_QEMU_BINARY is not set Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-02-06 9:01 ` Thomas Huth
2025-02-28 9:50 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2025-02-05 15:59 ` [PATCH 2/5] tests/functional: remove unused 'bin_prefix' variable Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-02-06 9:23 ` Thomas Huth
2025-02-05 15:59 ` [PATCH 3/5] tests/functional: set 'qemu_bin' as an object level field Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-02-06 9:24 ` Thomas Huth
2025-02-05 15:59 ` [PATCH 4/5] tests/functional: remove all class level fields Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-02-06 9:27 ` Thomas Huth
2025-02-05 15:59 ` [PATCH 5/5] tests/functional: skip mem addr test on 32-bit hosts Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-02-05 16:40 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-02-05 16:53 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-02-05 18:08 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-02-05 18:25 ` Richard Henderson
2025-02-06 9:29 ` Thomas Huth
2025-02-05 18:24 ` Richard Henderson
2025-02-05 18:47 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-02-05 18:50 ` Richard Henderson
2025-02-06 9:35 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-02-06 9:46 ` Thomas Huth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z8GG_dcCqo8_X4RR@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).