From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Camilla Conte <cconte@redhat.com>, Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: Kubernetes gitlab-runner jobs cannot be scheduled
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 13:11:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z8Wqi3PtQHjQYr-G@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJSP0QUt6YK7PCZ92hmNaVfL+nSSNsQg3KKcpP79SCNJtvfajA@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 07:01:16PM +0800, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2025 at 5:26 PM Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 3, 2025 at 8:35 AM Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > GitLab says:
> > > "There has been a timeout failure or the job got stuck. Check your
> > > timeout limits or try again"
> > >
> > > Duration: 77 minutes 13 seconds
> > > Timeout: 1h (from project)
> > >
> > > It ran 17 minutes longer than the job timeout.
> >
> > The job only seems to have run for roughly 15-20 minutes.
> >
> > I am not sure what's going on, but I have opened a ticket with DO to
> > request both larger droplets (16 vCPU / 32 GB) and a higher limit (25
> > droplets). This matches roughly what was available on Azure.
> >
> > Let me know if you prefer to go back to Azure for the time being.
>
> Yes, please. I'm unable to merge pull requests (with a clear
> conscience at least) because running CI to completion is taking so
> long with many manual retries needed.
>
> Perhaps the timeouts will go away once the droplet size is increased.
> It makes sense that running the jobs on different hardware might
> require readjusting timeouts.
It is a bit surprising to see timeouts, as we've fine tuned our test
timeouts to cope with GitLab's default shared runners, which is what
contributors use when CI runs in a fork. These runners only have
2 VCPUs and 8 GB of RAM, so that's a pretty low resource baseline
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-03 13:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-01 6:19 Kubernetes gitlab-runner jobs cannot be scheduled Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-03-01 6:36 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-03-01 7:27 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-03-03 7:35 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-03-03 9:25 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-03-03 11:01 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2025-03-03 13:11 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z8Wqi3PtQHjQYr-G@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=cconte@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).