From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0757C19F32 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2025 07:32:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tqSC0-0007b8-EE; Fri, 07 Mar 2025 02:32:24 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tqSBq-0007ac-2B for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 07 Mar 2025 02:32:14 -0500 Received: from mgamail.intel.com ([192.198.163.8]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tqSBo-00043L-3H for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 07 Mar 2025 02:32:13 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1741332732; x=1772868732; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=0n9mnucRi4sYNV486/6Gw1e7LpF2GnO1kkWy7c3sKFk=; b=TXqwYR8oAB0QIDLwXMeqbcPSCWg9PWkkps/iNCFTWy7ZRghc+H4f0sUg UYPdEv+mPeGj8ljVaNZhGJtXAQT+YrF0a6AYVHY9p/WtbISaSYsJLZrKo cO3rL04jS+CjIcoctHbrxECf0wmBcAX8/pnSZuaBBQ4P38TCozVaNuuuv CV0PqgsvgM3/F4kH/1YhgAYiVh5j/+vpvgMZmDYyvQ8FGzzK64EBskgeR ECsFETVZHDh3GxbpNbSiOg+moNFzPtqkvh1WkEeUVpVPejsgce/Wiem4b RSC/PTYvLiFvprULO5vYls10SlL4JcMaN0T4o+jr3Q/uR6qfpbkCloH4G g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 6BQ7NITnRRyy4EOr9iXA2g== X-CSE-MsgGUID: vkl8Rh0kR3ONgiYA4da/6Q== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11365"; a="59931186" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.14,228,1736841600"; d="scan'208";a="59931186" Received: from fmviesa002.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.142]) by fmvoesa102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Mar 2025 23:32:09 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Z1+BL8nvTUqYhVfuIt1Egg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: eTZR0ffEQceqcW7KL2AxEg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.14,228,1736841600"; d="scan'208";a="142483946" Received: from liuzhao-optiplex-7080.sh.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.239.160.39]) by fmviesa002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 06 Mar 2025 23:32:05 -0800 Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 15:52:14 +0800 From: Zhao Liu To: dongli.zhang@oracle.com Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com, sandipan.das@amd.com, babu.moger@amd.com, likexu@tencent.com, like.xu.linux@gmail.com, zhenyuw@linux.intel.com, groug@kaod.org, khorenko@virtuozzo.com, alexander.ivanov@virtuozzo.com, den@virtuozzo.com, davydov-max@yandex-team.ru, xiaoyao.li@intel.com, dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com, joe.jin@oracle.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/10] [DO NOT MERGE] kvm: Introduce kvm_arch_pre_create_vcpu() Message-ID: References: <20250302220112.17653-1-dongli.zhang@oracle.com> <20250302220112.17653-4-dongli.zhang@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=192.198.163.8; envelope-from=zhao1.liu@intel.com; helo=mgamail.intel.com X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org > I didn't know if I would need to wait until this patch is merged into > mainline QEMU. That's why I didn't add my signed-off. No problem if Xiaoyao is okay with it (copyright of patches need to honor the original author & signed-off). IMO, if your series is accepted first, it also helps to reduce the size of the TDX series, and it helps the subsequent PMU development (like mediated PMU). Conversely, it's also not a big deal; you can simply rebase and remove this patch at that time. Even I'm thinking that my KVM PMU filter should perhaps base on your work. > I will add in v3 and remove "DO NOT MERGE" if the patch isn't in QEMU when > I am sending out v3. Okay. Thanks, Zhao