From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: "Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] tests/functional/asset: Fail assert fetch when retries are exceeded
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 08:13:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z9FCPL2iucV3KsyG@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250312051739.938441-2-npiggin@gmail.com>
On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 03:17:36PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> Currently the fetch code does not fail gracefully when retry limit is
> exceeded, it just falls through the loop with no file, which ends up
> hitting other errors.
>
> In preparation for adding more cases where a download gets retried,
> add an explicit check for retry limit exceeded.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
> ---
> tests/functional/qemu_test/asset.py | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/functional/qemu_test/asset.py b/tests/functional/qemu_test/asset.py
> index f0730695f09..6a1c92ffbef 100644
> --- a/tests/functional/qemu_test/asset.py
> +++ b/tests/functional/qemu_test/asset.py
> @@ -116,7 +116,10 @@ def fetch(self):
> self.log.info("Downloading %s to %s...", self.url, self.cache_file)
> tmp_cache_file = self.cache_file.with_suffix(".download")
>
> - for retries in range(3):
> + for retries in range(4):
> + if retries == 3:
> + raise Exception("Retries exceeded downloading %s", self.url)
While it works, it feels a bit wierd to me. Given the error retry
scenario will unlink the file, I think it would be better todo
if not os.path.exists(tmp_cache_file)
raise Exception(...)
immediately after the for() loop
> +
> try:
> with tmp_cache_file.open("xb") as dst:
> with urllib.request.urlopen(self.url) as resp:
> --
> 2.47.1
>
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-12 8:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-12 5:17 [PATCH 0/3] tests/functional/asset: improve partial-download handling Nicholas Piggin
2025-03-12 5:17 ` [PATCH 1/3] tests/functional/asset: Fail assert fetch when retries are exceeded Nicholas Piggin
2025-03-12 6:40 ` Thomas Huth
2025-03-12 8:13 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2025-03-12 5:17 ` [PATCH 2/3] tests/functional/asset: Verify downloaded size Nicholas Piggin
2025-03-12 6:49 ` Thomas Huth
2025-03-12 5:17 ` [PATCH 3/3] tests/functional/asset: Add AssetError exception class Nicholas Piggin
2025-03-12 6:56 ` Thomas Huth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z9FCPL2iucV3KsyG@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).