From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4E32C282EC for ; Tue, 18 Mar 2025 02:21:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tuMa1-0002Y2-Jl; Mon, 17 Mar 2025 22:21:21 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tuMZw-0002XQ-F4; Mon, 17 Mar 2025 22:21:16 -0400 Received: from mgamail.intel.com ([198.175.65.16]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tuMZu-0003VA-5y; Mon, 17 Mar 2025 22:21:16 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1742264474; x=1773800474; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=8lY3VflEeQ3vkSLfLaF4mdXmPsUnhwLmjtVsXtyGlus=; b=W4w4uF8x2yZRkSos0wOJ8my/BtoqA4V1crDjII+BrYXu7NPETBrrIKm8 k45OiKbZUerQPX/RTKLoqhy72QKyMwNKOPI6Mjf9Y351fA6U1WJtzPzj8 Tm9Ayaaajz+jtkYWtypGmNrJcffDCldCHs1JuxaT+kszesY2CJBu6q0Qj PwqIbmsPGUKt2KB62sC406+eFQVIC0YnlArWZ4Kg/OsttUgGfXONldVWT btMDPsPXEU1gmz6qPdUNgTblcjigVbBYCAWOuzX21ymnzCbFRvfFZStMh /QIZkc1yQsoQ36RNQYh8wPF1dIfeuaEkWCu+LGyZPCsSXH5JMWzcKYfET A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: cfl1JxfCTtiw+bs5StnctQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: hAImenXMQ2aODgPT6x2bwA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11376"; a="43487402" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.14,255,1736841600"; d="scan'208";a="43487402" Received: from fmviesa002.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.142]) by orvoesa108.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Mar 2025 19:21:10 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: O3cjkuOVQbWqlyzpjBt8sg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 6D6rCznNQq6kp1gj8Soswg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.14,255,1736841600"; d="scan'208";a="145290354" Received: from liuzhao-optiplex-7080.sh.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.239.160.39]) by fmviesa002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Mar 2025 19:21:09 -0700 Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 10:41:22 +0800 From: Zhao Liu To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-rust@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/17] rust/vmstate: Add a prefix separator ", " for the array field in vmstate macros Message-ID: References: <20250317151236.536673-1-zhao1.liu@intel.com> <20250317151236.536673-4-zhao1.liu@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=198.175.65.16; envelope-from=zhao1.liu@intel.com; helo=mgamail.intel.com X-Spam_score_int: -46 X-Spam_score: -4.7 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.335, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 05:37:06PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 17:37:06 +0100 > From: Paolo Bonzini > Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/17] rust/vmstate: Add a prefix separator ", " for > the array field in vmstate macros > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 3:52 PM Zhao Liu wrote: > > > > The fields are separated by ",", so it's necessary to add ", " in array > > field to avoid matching failure. > > This is not a field though, the only (intended) fields are name and > field. It's meant to mimic the slice since &a[0..n]. > Oops, I misunderstood the format...yes, something like vmstate_struct!(HPETState, timers[0 .. num_timers], VMSTATE_HPET_TIMER, BqlRefCell) can work! I'll drop this patch and refresh the unit test in v2. Thanks, Zhao