From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] iotests: make meson aware of individual I/O tests
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2023 18:54:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZADw7p4ZRgVuhg+a@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230302184606.418541-1-berrange@redhat.com>
On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 06:46:01PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> To just repeat the patch 5 description...
>
> Currently meson registers a single test that invokes an entire group of
> I/O tests, hiding the test granularity from meson. There are various
> downsides of doing this
>
> * You cannot ask 'meson test' to invoke a single I/O test
> * The meson test timeout can't be applied to the individual
> tests
> * Meson only gets a pass/fail for the overall I/O test group
> not individual tests
Another big benefit is that we get to see the execution time of
every I/O test, so can identify which handful of tests are making
it take almost 5 minutes to run in gitlab...
The really big 4 are:
199/314 qemu:block / qemu-iotests-qcow2-040 OK 16.62s 1 subtests passed
200/314 qemu:block / qemu-iotests-qcow2-041 OK 44.51s 1 subtests passed
265/314 qemu:block / qemu-iotests-qcow2-191 OK 17.93s 1 subtests passed
282/314 qemu:block / qemu-iotests-qcow2-271 OK 25.03s 1 subtests passed
there are a bunch in the ~5 second range, and then most are
1 second or less.
> * If a CI job gets killed by the GitLab timeout, we don't
> get visibility into how far through the I/O tests
> execution got.
>
> This is not really specific to the I/O tests, the problem is common
> to any case of us running a test which is in fact another test
> harness which runs many tests. It would be nice to have meson have
> the full view of all tests run. Adapting the I/O tests is as easy
> win in this respect.
>
> This switches meson to perform test discovery by invoking 'check' in
> dry-run mode. It then registers one meson test case for each I/O
> test. Parallel execution remains disabled since the I/O tests do not
> use self contained execution environments and thus conflict with
> each other.
>
> Compare contrast output from a current job:
>
> https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/jobs/3863603546
>
> [quote]
> 204/224 qemu:block / qemu-iotests qcow2 OK 329.94s 119 subtests passed
> [/quote]
>
> Vs what is seen with this series:
>
> https://gitlab.com/berrange/qemu/-/jobs/3865975463
>
> [quote]
> 204/350 qemu:block / qemu-iotests-qcow2-001 OK 2.16s 1 subtests passed
> 205/350 qemu:block / qemu-iotests-qcow2-002 OK 2.77s 1 subtests passed
>
> ...snip...
>
> 329/350 qemu:block / qemu-iotests-qcow2-qemu-img-close-errors OK 6.19s 1 subtests passed
> 330/350 qemu:block / qemu-iotests-qcow2-qsd-jobs OK 0.55s 1 subtests passed
> [/quote]
>
> A few tweaks were needed to the iotests runner because it had a few
> assumptions about it always running in a tree that has already been
> built, which is obviously not the case at the time meson does test
> discovery.
>
> Daniel P. Berrangé (5):
> iotests: explicitly pass source/build dir to 'check' command
> iotests: allow test discovery before building
> iotests: strip subdir path when listing tests
> iotests: print TAP protocol version when reporting tests
> iotests: register each I/O test separately with meson
>
> tests/qemu-iotests/check | 11 +++++++++--
> tests/qemu-iotests/meson.build | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> tests/qemu-iotests/testenv.py | 22 +++++++++++++++++----
> tests/qemu-iotests/testrunner.py | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.39.2
>
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-02 18:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-02 18:46 [PATCH 0/5] iotests: make meson aware of individual I/O tests Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-02 18:46 ` [PATCH 1/5] iotests: explicitly pass source/build dir to 'check' command Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-03 12:55 ` Alex Bennée
2023-03-03 13:01 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-02 18:46 ` [PATCH 2/5] iotests: allow test discovery before building Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-03 8:14 ` Thomas Huth
2023-03-03 12:56 ` Alex Bennée
2023-03-02 18:46 ` [PATCH 3/5] iotests: strip subdir path when listing tests Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-03 12:58 ` Alex Bennée
2023-03-02 18:46 ` [PATCH 4/5] iotests: print TAP protocol version when reporting tests Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-03 8:17 ` Thomas Huth
2023-03-03 12:58 ` Alex Bennée
2023-03-02 18:46 ` [PATCH 5/5] iotests: register each I/O test separately with meson Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-03 9:34 ` Thomas Huth
2023-03-03 10:21 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-02 18:54 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2023-03-03 8:30 ` [PATCH 0/5] iotests: make meson aware of individual I/O tests Thomas Huth
2023-03-03 8:53 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-03 9:39 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-03 10:27 ` Thomas Huth
2023-03-03 10:45 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-03 13:06 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-03 15:49 ` Thomas Huth
2023-03-03 15:52 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZADw7p4ZRgVuhg+a@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=hreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).