From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: "Longpeng(Mike)" <longpeng2@huawei.com>,
pbonzini@redhat.com, david@redhat.com, philmd@linaro.org,
mst@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, eperezma@redhat.com,
arei.gonglei@huawei.com, yechuan@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memory: avoid unnecessary iteration when updating ioeventfds
Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2023 16:27:45 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZAUJUfxeqDDpRhZW@x1n> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACGkMEtvGwCVzSa1UpXK971bynNqybPAVa3QQ9e9Hw04j-ivHQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 04:36:20PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 10:25 PM Longpeng(Mike) <longpeng2@huawei.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Longpeng <longpeng2@huawei.com>
> >
> > When updating ioeventfds, we need to iterate all address spaces and
> > iterate all flat ranges of each address space. There is so much
> > redundant process that a FlatView would be iterated for so many times
> > during one commit (memory_region_transaction_commit).
> >
> > We can mark a FlatView as UPDATED and then skip it in the next iteration
> > and clear the UPDATED flag at the end of the commit. The overhead can
> > be significantly reduced.
> >
> > For example, a VM with 16 vdpa net devices and each one has 65 vectors,
> > can reduce the time spent on memory_region_transaction_commit by 95%.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Longpeng <longpeng2@huawei.com>
> > ---
> > include/exec/memory.h | 2 ++
> > softmmu/memory.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/exec/memory.h b/include/exec/memory.h
> > index 2e602a2fad..974eabf765 100644
> > --- a/include/exec/memory.h
> > +++ b/include/exec/memory.h
> > @@ -1093,6 +1093,8 @@ struct FlatView {
> > unsigned nr_allocated;
> > struct AddressSpaceDispatch *dispatch;
> > MemoryRegion *root;
> > +#define FLATVIEW_FLAG_IOEVENTFD_UPDATED (1 << 0)
> > + unsigned flags;
> > };
> >
> > static inline FlatView *address_space_to_flatview(AddressSpace *as)
> > diff --git a/softmmu/memory.c b/softmmu/memory.c
> > index 9d64efca26..71ff996712 100644
> > --- a/softmmu/memory.c
> > +++ b/softmmu/memory.c
> > @@ -815,6 +815,15 @@ FlatView *address_space_get_flatview(AddressSpace *as)
> > return view;
> > }
> >
> > +static void address_space_reset_view_flags(AddressSpace *as, unsigned mask)
> > +{
> > + FlatView *view = address_space_get_flatview(as);
> > +
> > + if (view->flags & mask) {
> > + view->flags &= ~mask;
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > static void address_space_update_ioeventfds(AddressSpace *as)
> > {
> > FlatView *view;
> > @@ -825,6 +834,12 @@ static void address_space_update_ioeventfds(AddressSpace *as)
> > AddrRange tmp;
> > unsigned i;
> >
> > + view = address_space_get_flatview(as);
> > + if (view->flags & FLATVIEW_FLAG_IOEVENTFD_UPDATED) {
> > + return;
> > + }
> > + view->flags |= FLATVIEW_FLAG_IOEVENTFD_UPDATED;
> > +
>
> Won't we lose the listener calls if multiple address spaces have the
> same flatview?
I have the same concern with Jason. I don't think it matters in reality,
since only address_space_io uses it so far. but it doesn't really look
reasonable and clean.
One other idea of optimizing ioeventfd update is we can add a per-AS
counter (ioeventfd_notifiers), increase if any eventfd_add|del is
registered in memory_listener_register(), and decrease when unregister.
Then address_space_update_ioeventfds() can be skipped completely if
ioeventfd_notifiers==0.
Side note: Jason, do you think we should drop vhost_eventfd_add|del?
They're all no-ops right now.
Thanks,
--
Peter Xu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-05 21:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-28 14:25 [PATCH] memory: avoid unnecessary iteration when updating ioeventfds Longpeng(Mike) via
2023-02-28 17:16 ` David Hildenbrand
2023-03-01 8:36 ` Jason Wang
2023-03-05 21:27 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2023-03-06 3:46 ` Jason Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZAUJUfxeqDDpRhZW@x1n \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=arei.gonglei@huawei.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=longpeng2@huawei.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=yechuan@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).