qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
	"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
	qemu-arm@nongnu.org, "Maxim Levitsky" <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
	libvir-list@redhat.com,
	"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	"Reinoud Zandijk" <reinoud@netbsd.org>,
	"Wilfred Mallawa" <wilfred.mallawa@wdc.com>,
	"John Paul Adrian Glaubitz" <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] docs/about/deprecated: Deprecate the qemu-system-i386 binary
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2023 14:06:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZAXzUIs6wODe7/hf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a97c8b6d-8e58-82b5-d73f-72a7061fb5d4@redhat.com>

On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 02:48:16PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 06/03/2023 10.27, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 09:46:55AM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > > [...] If a 32-bit CPU guest
> > > +environment should be enforced, you can switch off the "long mode" CPU
> > > +flag, e.g. with ``-cpu max,lm=off``.
> > 
> > I had the idea to check this today and this is not quite sufficient,
> [...]
> > A further difference is that qemy-system-i686 does not appear to enable
> > the 'syscall' flag, but I've not figured out where that difference is
> > coming from in the code.
> 
> I think I just spotted this by accident in target/i386/cpu.c
> around line 637:
> 
> #ifdef TARGET_X86_64
> #define TCG_EXT2_X86_64_FEATURES (CPUID_EXT2_SYSCALL | CPUID_EXT2_LM)
> #else
> #define TCG_EXT2_X86_64_FEATURES 0
> #endif

Hmm, so right now the difference between qemu-system-i386 and
qemu-system-x86_64 is based on compile time conditionals. So we
have the burden of building everything twice and also a burden
of testing everything twice.

If we eliminate qemu-system-i386 we get rid of our own burden,
but users/mgmt apps need to adapt to force qemu-system-x86_64
to present a 32-bit system.

What about if we had qemu-system-i386 be a hardlink to
qemu-system-x86_64, and then changed behaviour based off the
executed binary name ?

ie if running qemu-system-i386, we could present a 32-bit CPU by
default. We eliminate all of our double compilation burden still.
We still have extra testing burden, but it is in a fairly narrow
area, so does not imply x2 the testing burden just $small-percentage
extra testing ?  That would means apps/users would not need to change
at all, but we still get most of the win we're after on the
QEMU side 

Essentially #ifdef TARGET_X86_64  would be change  'if (is_64bit) {...}'
in a handful of places, with 'bool is_64bit' initialized in main() from
argv[0] ?

With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|



  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-06 14:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-06  8:46 [PATCH v4 0/5] Deprecate system emulation support for 32-bit x86 and arm hosts Thomas Huth
2023-03-06  8:46 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] docs/about/deprecated: Deprecate 32-bit x86 hosts for system emulation Thomas Huth
2023-03-06  8:46 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] docs/about/deprecated: Deprecate the qemu-system-i386 binary Thomas Huth
2023-03-06  9:27   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-06  9:54     ` Thomas Huth
2023-03-06  9:58       ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-06 13:48     ` Thomas Huth
2023-03-06 14:06       ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2023-03-06 14:18         ` Thomas Huth
2023-03-06 14:25           ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-06 14:58             ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-06 14:56         ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-03-06  8:46 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] gitlab-ci.d/crossbuilds: Drop the i386 system emulation job Thomas Huth
2023-03-06  9:19   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-03-06  8:46 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] docs/about/deprecated: Deprecate 32-bit arm hosts for system emulation Thomas Huth
2023-03-06  9:23   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-03-07  2:43   ` Richard Henderson
2023-03-06  8:46 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] gitlab-ci.d/crossbuilds: Drop the 32-bit arm system emulation jobs Thomas Huth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZAXzUIs6wODe7/hf@redhat.com \
    --to=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de \
    --cc=libvir-list@redhat.com \
    --cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=reinoud@netbsd.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=wilfred.mallawa@wdc.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).