Re: Fortnightly KVM call for 2023-02-07

[Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>]

On Tue, Feb 28, 2023, Juan Quintela wrote:
> Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023, Juan Quintela wrote:
> >> Please, send any topic that you are interested in covering in the next
> >> call in 2 weeks.
> >> 
> >> We have already topics:
> >> - single qemu binary
> >>   People on previous call (today) asked if Markus, Paolo and Peter could
> >>   be there on next one to further discuss the topic.
> >> 
> >> - Huge Memory guests
> >> 
> >>   Will send a separate email with the questions that we want to discuss
> >>   later during the week.
> >> 
> >> After discussions on the QEMU Summit, we are going to have always open a
> >> KVM call where you can add topics.
> >
> > Hi Juan!
> >
> > I have a somewhat odd request: can I convince you to rename "KVM call" to something
> > like "QEMU+KVM call"?
> >
> > I would like to kickstart a recurring public meeting/forum that (almost) exclusively
> > targets internal KVM development, but I don't to cause confusion and definitely don't
> > want to usurp your meeting.  The goal/purpose of the KVM-specific meeting would be to
> > do design reviews, syncs, etc. on KVM internals and things like KVM selftests, while,
> > IIUC, the current "KVM call" is aimed at at the entire KVM+QEMU+VFIO ecosystem.
> 
> I can do that.
> I would have told you that you could use our slots, but right now we are
> quite low on slots.
> 
> If nobody objects, I will change that for the next call.

Thanks, much appreciated!