From: Yang Zhong <yang.zhong@linux.intel.com>
To: "Yang, Weijiang" <weijiang.yang@intel.com>,
Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>
Cc: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>,
"pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Zhong, Yang" <yang.zhong@intel.com>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2] target/i386: Switch back XFRM value
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 01:32:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZC5ZasjwCbnoA04A@yangzhon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3df48e2b-f417-21dc-d386-95399c3e694e@intel.com>
On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 04:03:54PM +0800, Yang, Weijiang wrote:
>
> On 3/27/2023 3:33 PM, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 2:36 AM Yang, Weijiang <weijiang.yang@intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 10/26/2022 7:57 PM, Zhong, Yang wrote:
> > > > The previous patch wrongly replaced FEAT_XSAVE_XCR0_{LO|HI} with
> > > > FEAT_XSAVE_XSS_{LO|HI} in CPUID(EAX=12,ECX=1):{ECX,EDX}, which made
> > > > SGX enclave only supported SSE and x87 feature(xfrm=0x3).
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: 301e90675c3f ("target/i386: Enable support for XSAVES based features")
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Yang Zhong <yang.zhong@linux.intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > target/i386/cpu.c | 4 ++--
> > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c
> > > > index ad623d91e4..19aaed877b 100644
> > > > --- a/target/i386/cpu.c
> > > > +++ b/target/i386/cpu.c
> > > > @@ -5584,8 +5584,8 @@ void cpu_x86_cpuid(CPUX86State *env, uint32_t index, uint32_t count,
> > > > } else {
> > > > *eax &= env->features[FEAT_SGX_12_1_EAX];
> > > > *ebx &= 0; /* ebx reserve */
> > > > - *ecx &= env->features[FEAT_XSAVE_XSS_LO];
> > > > - *edx &= env->features[FEAT_XSAVE_XSS_HI];
> > > > + *ecx &= env->features[FEAT_XSAVE_XCR0_LO];
> > > > + *edx &= env->features[FEAT_XSAVE_XCR0_HI];
> > > Oops, that's my fault to replace with wrong definitions, thanks for the fix!
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@intel.com>
> > Hi,
> > I do not have any background on this but stumbled over this and wondered,
> > is there any particular reason why this wasn't applied yet?
> >
> > It seemed to fix a former mistake, was acked and then ... silence
>
> Chris, thanks for the catch!
>
> I double checked this patch isn't in the latest 8.0.0-rc1 tree.
>
>
> Hi, Paolo,
>
> Could you help merge this fixup patch? Thanks!
Hello all,
Let me rebase this patch and resend it, thanks!
Yang
>
> >
> > > > /* FP and SSE are always allowed regardless of XSAVE/XCR0. */
> > > > *ecx |= XSTATE_FP_MASK | XSTATE_SSE_MASK;
> >
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-06 5:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-26 11:57 [RESEND PATCH v2] target/i386: Switch back XFRM value Yang Zhong
2022-10-27 0:28 ` Yang, Weijiang
2023-03-27 7:33 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2023-03-27 8:03 ` Yang, Weijiang
2023-04-06 5:32 ` Yang Zhong [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZC5ZasjwCbnoA04A@yangzhon \
--to=yang.zhong@linux.intel.com \
--cc=christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=weijiang.yang@intel.com \
--cc=yang.zhong@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).