From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org,
Fam Zheng <fam@euphon.net>,
qemu-stable@nongnu.org, Qing Wang <qinwang@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-8.0 v2] aio-posix: fix race between epoll upgrade and aio_set_fd_handler()
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2023 15:14:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZCGW0TaUKriIVi4V@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230323144859.1338495-1-stefanha@redhat.com>
Am 23.03.2023 um 15:48 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> If another thread calls aio_set_fd_handler() while the IOThread event
> loop is upgrading from ppoll(2) to epoll(7) then we might miss new
> AioHandlers. The epollfd will not monitor the new AioHandler's fd,
> resulting in hangs.
>
> Take the AioHandler list lock while upgrading to epoll. This prevents
> AioHandlers from changing while epoll is being set up. If we cannot lock
> because we're in a nested event loop, then don't upgrade to epoll (it
> will happen next time we're not in a nested call).
>
> The downside to taking the lock is that the aio_set_fd_handler() thread
> has to wait until the epoll upgrade is finished, which involves many
> epoll_ctl(2) system calls. However, this scenario is rare and I couldn't
> think of another solution that is still simple.
>
> Reported-by: Qing Wang <qinwang@redhat.com>
> Buglink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2090998
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Cc: Fam Zheng <fam@euphon.net>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
> ---
> v2:
> - Use qemu_lockcnt_inc_and_unlock() instead of qemu_lockcnt_unlock() [Paolo]
Thanks, applied to the block branch.
Kevin
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-27 13:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-23 14:48 [PATCH for-8.0 v2] aio-posix: fix race between epoll upgrade and aio_set_fd_handler() Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-03-27 13:14 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZCGW0TaUKriIVi4V@redhat.com \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=fam@euphon.net \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-stable@nongnu.org \
--cc=qinwang@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).