Re: [PATCH v2] linux-user: preserve incoming order of environment variables in the target

["Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>]

On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 04:04:43PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> On Mär 29 2023, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 03:55:13PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> >> Do not reverse the order of environment variables in the target environ
> >> array relative to the incoming environ order.  Some testsuites depend on a
> >> specific order, even though it is not defined by any standard.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
> >> ---
> >>  linux-user/main.c | 6 ++++++
> >>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >
> > bsd-user/main.c appears to have an identical code pattern that
> > will need the same fix
> 
> Yes, but I cannot test it, so I like to let someone else produce the
> patch.

The code in this case is 100% identical, so I think it is
reasonable to expect that patch to cover both of them
regardless.

In terms of testing we don't require the contributors to test
all platform combinations affected. Our FreeBSD CI jobs will
test the build of bsd-user.

If so desired though, any contributor can easily test BSD changes
too via our VM infra. eg  "make vm-build-freebsd" (see make vm-help
for further options)

With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|