From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>, John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>,
Li Zhijian <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
Zhang Chen <chen.zhang@intel.com>,
Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] tests/qtests: remove migration test iterations config
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2023 10:07:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZEjp1o9lGfQFXNZG@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r0scgats.fsf@secure.mitica>
On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 11:54:55PM +0200, Juan Quintela wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> wrote:
> > The 'unsigned int interations' config for migration is somewhat
> > overkill. Most tests don't set it, and a value of '0' is treated
> > as equivalent to '1'. The only test that does set it, xbzrle,
> > used a value of '2'.
> >
> > This setting, however, only relates to the migration iterations
> > that take place prior to allowing convergence. IOW, on top of
> > this iteration count, there is always at least 1 further migration
> > iteration done to deal with pages that are dirtied during the
> > previous iteration(s).
> >
> > IOW, even with iterations==1, the xbzrle test will be running for
> > a minimum of 2 iterations. With this in mind we can simplify the
> > code and just get rid of the special case.
>
> Perhaps the old code was already wrong, but we need at least three
> iterations for the xbzrle test:
> - 1st iteration: xbzrle is not used, nothing is on cache.
Are you sure about this ? I see ram_save_page() calling
save_xbzrle_page() and unless I'm mis-understanding the
code, it doesn't appear to skip anything on the 1st
iteration.
IIUC save_xbzrle_page will add pages into the cache on
the first iteration, so the second iteration will get
cache hits
> - 2nd iteration: pages are put into cache, no xbzrle is used because
> there is no previous page.
> - 3rd iteration: We really use xbzrle now against the copy of the
> previous iterations.
>
> And yes, this should be commented somewhere.
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-26 9:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-21 17:14 [PATCH v2 0/6] tests/qtest: make migration-test massively faster Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-04-21 17:14 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] tests/qtest: replace qmp_discard_response with qtest_qmp_assert_success Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-04-21 21:52 ` Juan Quintela
2023-04-23 2:22 ` Zhang, Chen
2023-04-21 17:14 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] tests/qtests: remove migration test iterations config Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-04-21 21:54 ` Juan Quintela
2023-04-26 9:07 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2023-04-26 9:42 ` Juan Quintela
2023-04-26 10:15 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-04-21 17:14 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] tests/qtest: capture RESUME events during migration Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-04-21 21:59 ` Juan Quintela
2023-04-24 9:53 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-05-26 11:56 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-04-21 17:14 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] tests/qtest: make more migration pre-copy scenarios run non-live Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-04-21 22:06 ` Juan Quintela
2023-04-24 21:01 ` Fabiano Rosas
2023-05-26 17:58 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-05-31 12:15 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-04-21 17:14 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] tests/qtest: massively speed up migration-tet Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-04-21 22:15 ` Juan Quintela
2023-04-21 17:14 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] tests/migration: Only run auto_converge in slow mode Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-04-23 2:41 ` Zhang, Chen
2023-04-24 5:58 ` Juan Quintela
2023-04-24 6:56 ` Thomas Huth
2023-04-24 8:05 ` Zhang, Chen
2023-04-24 8:06 ` Zhang, Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZEjp1o9lGfQFXNZG@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=chen.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=lizhijian@fujitsu.com \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).