Re: [PATCH v4 03/20] virtio-scsi: avoid race between unplug and transport event

[Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>]

Am 25.04.2023 um 19:26 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> Only report a transport reset event to the guest after the SCSIDevice
> has been unrealized by qdev_simple_device_unplug_cb().
> 
> qdev_simple_device_unplug_cb() sets the SCSIDevice's qdev.realized field
> to false so that scsi_device_find/get() no longer see it.
> 
> scsi_target_emulate_report_luns() also needs to be updated to filter out
> SCSIDevices that are unrealized.
> 
> These changes ensure that the guest driver does not see the SCSIDevice
> that's being unplugged if it responds very quickly to the transport
> reset event.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Daniil Tatianin <d-tatianin@yandex-team.ru>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>

> @@ -1082,6 +1073,15 @@ static void virtio_scsi_hotunplug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev, DeviceState *dev,
>          blk_set_aio_context(sd->conf.blk, qemu_get_aio_context(), NULL);
>          virtio_scsi_release(s);
>      }
> +
> +    if (virtio_vdev_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_SCSI_F_HOTPLUG)) {
> +        virtio_scsi_acquire(s);
> +        virtio_scsi_push_event(s, sd,
> +                               VIRTIO_SCSI_T_TRANSPORT_RESET,
> +                               VIRTIO_SCSI_EVT_RESET_REMOVED);
> +        scsi_bus_set_ua(&s->bus, SENSE_CODE(REPORTED_LUNS_CHANGED));
> +        virtio_scsi_release(s);
> +    }
>  }

s, sd and s->bus are all unrealized at this point, whereas before this
patch they were still realized. I couldn't find any practical problem
with it, but it made me nervous enough that I thought I should comment
on it at least.

Should we maybe have documentation on these functions that says that
they accept unrealized objects as their parameters?

Kevin