qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
To: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com>
Cc: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>,
	Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com>,
	Weiwei Li <liweiwei@iscas.ac.cn>,
	Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>,
	Liu Zhiwei <zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com>,
	qemu-riscv@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] hw/riscv: virt: Assume M-mode FW in pflash0 only when "-bios none"
Date: Mon, 8 May 2023 16:53:46 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZFjbwh3CdljaHEZZ@sunil-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABJz62OTBEOMzcXLYc=DqRwH8N4DP=o0-kCfALwoREZVyOxLPg@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 03:00:02AM -0700, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 11:37:43AM +0530, Sunil V L wrote:
> > On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 07:37:23AM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > > On 4/25/23 12:25, Sunil V L wrote:
> > > > Currently, virt machine supports two pflash instances each with
> > > > 32MB size. However, the first pflash is always assumed to
> > > > contain M-mode firmware and reset vector is set to this if
> > > > enabled. Hence, for S-mode payloads like EDK2, only one pflash
> > > > instance is available for use. This means both code and NV variables
> > > > of EDK2 will need to use the same pflash.
> > > >
> > > > The OS distros keep the EDK2 FW code as readonly. When non-volatile
> > > > variables also need to share the same pflash, it is not possible
> > > > to keep it as readonly since variables need write access.
> > > >
> > > > To resolve this issue, the code and NV variables need to be separated.
> > > > But in that case we need an extra flash. Hence, modify the convention
> > > > such that pflash0 will contain the M-mode FW only when "-bios none"
> > > > option is used. Otherwise, pflash0 will contain the S-mode payload FW.
> > > > This enables both pflash instances available for EDK2 use.
> > > >
> > > > Example usage:
> > > > 1) pflash0 containing M-mode FW
> > > > qemu-system-riscv64 -bios none -pflash <mmode_fw> -machine virt
> > > > or
> > > > qemu-system-riscv64 -bios none \
> > > > -drive file=<mmode_fw>,if=pflash,format=raw,unit=0 -machine virt
> > > >
> > > > 2) pflash0 containing S-mode payload like EDK2
> > > > qemu-system-riscv64 -pflash <smode_fw_vars> -pflash <smode_fw_code> -machine  virt
> > > > or
> > > > qemu-system-riscv64 -bios <opensbi_fw> \
> > > > -pflash <smode_fw_vars> \
> > > > -pflash <smode_fw_code> \
> > >
> > > On amd64 and arm64 unit=0 is used for code and unit=1 is used for variables.
> > > Shouldn't riscv64 do the same?
> 
> Good catch, I had missed that!
> 
> > Is that a requirement from distros perspective? That was my original v1
> > design.
> >
> > But the reason why I kept unit0 for variables, it helps in keeping current
> > EDK2 usage model work. Otherwise, current EDK2 will break if we change
> > the code to unit 0.
> 
> I think that it's more important to align with other architectures.
> 
> The number of people currently running edk2 on RISC-V is probably
> vanishingly small, and in my opinion requiring them to tweak their
> command lines a bit is a fair price to pay to avoid having to carry a
> subtle difference between architectures for years to come.
> 
It is not just tweaking the command line. The current EDK2 will not work
anymore if code is moved to plfash 0 since EDK2 assumed its entry point
is in pflash1. I agree there may not be too many users but if we have
to align with other archs, there will be combinations of qemu and
edk2 versions which won't work.

> With that in mind, my preference would be to go back to v1.
> 
Thanks!. If this is the preference,  we can request people to use proper
versions of EDK2 with different qemu versions.

> > Second, since unit 0 for RISC-V is currently assumed to start in M-mode fw
> > which is secure, I think it makes sense to keep variables also in unit
> > 0.
> 
> If you're storing variables rather than code in pflash0, does it even
> make sense to talk about M-mode and S-mode?
>
> 
> Taking a step back, what is even the use case for having M-mode code
> in pflash0? If you want to use an M-mode firmware, can't you just use
> -bios instead? In other words, can we change the behavior so that
> pflash being present always mean loading S-mode firmware off it?
>
TBH, I don't know. I am sure Alistair would know since it was added in
https://github.com/qemu/qemu/commit/1c20d3ff6004b600336c52cbef9f134fad3ccd94
I don't think opensbi can be launched from pflash. So, it may be some
other use case which I am now aware of.

I will be happy if this can be avoided by using -bios.

Thanks,
Sunil


  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-08 11:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-25 10:25 [PATCH v2] hw/riscv: virt: Assume M-mode FW in pflash0 only when "-bios none" Sunil V L
2023-05-08  4:22 ` Sunil V L
2023-05-08  5:37 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2023-05-08  6:07   ` Sunil V L
2023-05-08 10:00     ` Andrea Bolognani
2023-05-08 11:23       ` Sunil V L [this message]
2023-05-08 11:44         ` Andrea Bolognani
2023-05-17  4:57           ` Alistair Francis
2023-05-17  5:09             ` Sunil V L
2023-05-17  8:45             ` Andrea Bolognani
2023-05-18  4:53               ` Alistair Francis
2023-05-19 15:58                 ` Andrea Bolognani
2023-05-17  5:01           ` Sunil V L
2023-05-17 12:47       ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-05-18  4:55         ` Alistair Francis
2023-05-18  6:03           ` Sunil V L
2023-05-19 16:34             ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-05-19 16:40               ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-05-23  9:58                 ` Andrea Bolognani
2023-05-18 15:34         ` Andrea Bolognani
2023-05-19 16:11 ` Andrea Bolognani
2023-05-19 16:14   ` Sunil V L

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZFjbwh3CdljaHEZZ@sunil-laptop \
    --to=sunilvl@ventanamicro.com \
    --cc=abologna@redhat.com \
    --cc=alistair.francis@wdc.com \
    --cc=bin.meng@windriver.com \
    --cc=dbarboza@ventanamicro.com \
    --cc=heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com \
    --cc=liweiwei@iscas.ac.cn \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-riscv@nongnu.org \
    --cc=zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).