From: Eldon Stegall <eldon-qemu@eldondev.com>
To: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: gitlab shared runner time expired
Date: Fri, 19 May 2023 00:41:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZGbFya2IqoDR8153@invalid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <58b8067d-3136-94ed-f53e-2ccd0feb8c75@linaro.org>
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 12:26:33PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> So, here we are again, out of runner time with 13 days left in the month.
>
> Did we come to any resolution since last time? Holding development for that long just
> isn't right, so I'll continue processing the hard way -- testing on private runners and
> local build machines.
Hi Richard,
We should have capacity for private runners to execute several jobs in
parallel. Here [1] is an example of one that ran on a private runner today.
I have been thinking about suggesting a strategy to run jobs that lend
themselves to amd64 linux runners pinned to private runners that match,
so more "shared" minutes can be spent on runners that have different
capabilites.
If there is another specific arch/OS runner you have in mind, I would be
happy to make efforts towards provisioning one in our infrastructure.
Particularly it seems like a lot of people are trying to use qemu to
support amd64 linux on M1 macs, so it might make sense to have a private
mac silicon macOS runner.
Also, since we have a hardware runner that can run with kvm capabilites,
it might make sense to carve some of those tests out for that tagged
runner.
Since this is relatively new, I think I was personally in an observational
period before seeking input on those goals, but let me know you thoughts.
Thanks,
Eldon
[1] https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/jobs/4310866300
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-19 0:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-18 19:26 gitlab shared runner time expired Richard Henderson
2023-05-19 0:41 ` Eldon Stegall [this message]
2023-05-19 15:39 ` Richard Henderson
2023-05-19 7:58 ` Mark Cave-Ayland
2023-05-19 8:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-05-19 8:47 ` Camilla Conte
2023-05-19 8:49 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-05-19 9:18 ` Peter Maydell
2023-05-19 13:30 ` Richard Henderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZGbFya2IqoDR8153@invalid \
--to=eldon-qemu@eldondev.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).