From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB1BBC7EE26 for ; Mon, 22 May 2023 09:11:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q11Zm-0003Hb-2h; Mon, 22 May 2023 05:11:36 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q11Za-000386-6N for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 May 2023 05:11:25 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q11ZW-0005sv-BY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 May 2023 05:11:21 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1684746678; x=1716282678; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=c19cHFg3Vnfl8t8WKcBpQQ1VuUtxaC8awxEA8D7gcMs=; b=Cd1dgmyg0SUJQOTPttuucMoBF/OoMN2/GMzLEzY9RydSW0U8i5Zk4RoB Lhy2WHzfalDF3jK73iPwemquMOXOCv+xK4hq2/uQxyOitQpDp6khW1tjo C88XaMqrxhz7eCtsLV0JYNWpc0nFCILAGFsvucdPh87YmuNYqTEFGRSK5 kyvtgDZz+wYYTJZDP8bQrRgXKscxkNaBlji+ykC8lLCjQ3UxsVDoyuYVb sQyhged/5Xl1VrOAEsyIgobB7YwtpHhb2b5vf4NWt7byHfdPJei/wZYOM LVF34NIYRLuH2nkQYNolSYAye3DNbk6B4Ey53H/TUHiPORyK2SzRu9y2i A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10717"; a="381093732" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.00,183,1681196400"; d="scan'208";a="381093732" Received: from fmsmga006.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.20]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 May 2023 02:11:14 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10717"; a="949991911" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.00,183,1681196400"; d="scan'208";a="949991911" Received: from yangzhon.bj.intel.com (HELO yangzhon) ([10.238.157.60]) by fmsmga006-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 May 2023 02:11:13 -0700 Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 05:11:02 -0400 From: Yang Zhong To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [PULL 00/68] i386, build system, KVM changes for 2023-05-18 Message-ID: References: <20230517174520.887405-1-pbonzini@redhat.com> <7e2b211f-8da8-3345-528d-bc6f3b35484d@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <7e2b211f-8da8-3345-528d-bc6f3b35484d@redhat.com> Received-SPF: none client-ip=192.55.52.88; envelope-from=yang.zhong@linux.intel.com; helo=mga01.intel.com X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 10:29:47AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 5/19/23 05:06, Yang Zhong wrote: > > > > Paolo, please help add below queued sgx fix into this PULL request, which was > > missed from last time, thanks a lot! > > https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2023-04/msg00841.html > > https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2023-04/msg00896.html > > Isn't this commit 72497cff896fecf74306ed33626c30e43633cdd6? > > Author: Yang Zhong > Date: Thu Apr 6 02:40:41 2023 -0400 > > target/i386: Change wrong XFRM value in SGX CPUID leaf > The previous patch wrongly replaced FEAT_XSAVE_XCR0_{LO|HI} with > FEAT_XSAVE_XSS_{LO|HI} in CPUID(EAX=12,ECX=1):{ECX,EDX}. As a result, > SGX enclaves only supported SSE and x87 feature (xfrm=0x3). > Fixes: 301e90675c3f ("target/i386: Enable support for XSAVES based features") > Signed-off-by: Yang Zhong > Reviewed-by: Yang Weijiang > Reviewed-by: Kai Huang > Message-Id: <20230406064041.420039-1-yang.zhong@linux.intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini > Oh, So sorry for this,,, it's my fault. I missed PULL email information for this patch, Apr 21 Paolo Bonzini (1.4K) [PULL 16/25] target/i386: Change wrong XFRM value in SGX CPUID leaf Regards, Yang > Paolo > >