From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>,
Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>,
Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 9/9] tests/qtest: massively speed up migration-test
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 17:05:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZHjBw2E+eJKNsniO@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZHi9OQz8PGuHMPpN@x1n>
On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 11:46:01AM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 02:24:00PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > The migration test cases that actually exercise live migration want to
> > ensure there is a minimum of two iterations of pre-copy, in order to
> > exercise the dirty tracking code.
> >
> > Historically we've queried the migration status, looking for the
> > 'dirty-sync-count' value to increment to track iterations. This was
> > not entirely reliable because often all the data would get transferred
> > quickly enough that the migration would finish before we wanted it
> > to. So we massively dropped the bandwidth and max downtime to
> > guarantee non-convergance. This had the unfortunate side effect
> > that every migration took at least 30 seconds to run (100 MB of
> > dirty pages / 3 MB/sec).
> >
> > This optimization takes a different approach to ensuring that a
> > mimimum of two iterations. Rather than waiting for dirty-sync-count
> > to increment, directly look for an indication that the source VM
> > has dirtied RAM that has already been transferred.
> >
> > On the source VM a magic marker is written just after the 3 MB
> > offset. The destination VM is now montiored to detect when the
> > magic marker is transferred. This gives a guarantee that the
> > first 3 MB of memory have been transferred. Now the source VM
> > memory is monitored at exactly the 3MB offset until we observe
> > a flip in its value. This gives us a guaranteed that the guest
> > workload has dirtied a byte that has already been transferred.
> >
> > Since we're looking at a place that is only 3 MB from the start
> > of memory, with the 3 MB/sec bandwidth, this test should complete
> > in 1 second, instead of 30 seconds.
> >
> > Once we've proved there is some dirty memory, migration can be
> > set back to full speed for the remainder of the 1st iteration,
> > and the entire of the second iteration at which point migration
> > should be complete.
> >
> > On a test machine this further reduces the migration test time
> > from 8 minutes to 1 minute 40.
>
> The outcome is definitely nice, but it does looks slightly hacky to me and
> make the test slightly more complicated.
>
> If it's all about making sure we finish the 1st iteration, can we simply
> add a src qemu parameter "switchover-hold"? If it's set, src never
> switchover to dst but keeps the iterations.
For *most* of the tests, we want to ensure there are a minimum
of 2 iterations. For the XBZRLE test we want to ensure there are
a minimum of 3 iterations, so the cache gets workout.
> Then migrate_ensure_non_converge() will be as simple as setting
> switchover-hold to true.
>
> I am even thinking whether there can even be real-life use case for that,
> e.g., where a user might want to have a pre-heat of a migration of some VM,
> and trigger it immediately when the admin really wants (the pre-heats moved
> most of the pages and keep doing so).
>
> It'll be also similar to what Avihai proposed here on switchover-ack, just
> an ack mechanism on the src side:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230530144821.1557-3-avihaih@nvidia.com
In general I strongly wanted to avoid adding special logic to the
migration code that makes it directly synchronize with the test
suite, because once we do that I don't think the test suite is a
providing coverage of the real world usage scenario.
IOW, if we add a switchover-ack feature, we should certainly have
*a* test that uses it, but we should not modify other tests because
we want to exercise the logic as it would run with apps that don't
rely on switchover-ack.
Also, this slow migration test is incredibly painful for people right
now, so I'd like to see us get a speed up committed to git quickly.
I don't want to block it on a feature proposal that might yet take
months to merge.
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-01 16:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-31 13:23 [PATCH v3 0/9] tests/qtest: make migration-test massively faster Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-05-31 13:23 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] tests/qtest: add various qtest_qmp_assert_success() variants Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01 9:23 ` Thomas Huth
2023-06-01 12:48 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01 12:04 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-01 12:20 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-01 12:51 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-05-31 13:23 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] tests/qtest: add support for callback to receive QMP events Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-05-31 14:57 ` Thomas Huth
2023-06-01 12:14 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-01 12:56 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-05-31 13:23 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] tests/qtest: get rid of 'qmp_command' helper in migration test Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01 9:26 ` Thomas Huth
2023-06-01 9:32 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01 12:17 ` Juan Quintela
2023-05-31 13:23 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] tests/qtest: get rid of some 'qtest_qmp' usage " Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01 9:28 ` Thomas Huth
2023-06-01 12:10 ` Juan Quintela
2023-05-31 13:23 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] tests/qtest: switch to using event callbacks for STOP event Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01 9:31 ` Thomas Huth
2023-06-01 12:23 ` Juan Quintela
2023-05-31 13:23 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] tests/qtest: replace wait_command() with qtest_qmp_assert_success Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01 9:37 ` Thomas Huth
2023-06-01 12:27 ` Juan Quintela
2023-05-31 13:23 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] tests/qtest: capture RESUME events during migration Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01 9:38 ` Thomas Huth
2023-06-01 12:31 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-01 12:34 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01 12:37 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-01 12:44 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-05-31 13:23 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] tests/qtest: make more migration pre-copy scenarios run non-live Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01 9:47 ` Thomas Huth
2023-06-01 12:33 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-01 12:38 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01 16:09 ` Thomas Huth
2023-06-01 16:17 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01 16:26 ` Peter Xu
2023-06-01 15:30 ` Peter Xu
2023-06-01 15:39 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01 15:53 ` Peter Xu
2023-06-01 15:55 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01 16:17 ` Peter Xu
2023-06-01 16:35 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01 16:59 ` Peter Xu
2023-06-01 22:58 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-01 22:55 ` Juan Quintela
2023-05-31 13:24 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] tests/qtest: massively speed up migration-test Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01 10:04 ` Thomas Huth
2023-06-01 15:46 ` Peter Xu
2023-06-01 16:05 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2023-06-01 16:22 ` Peter Xu
2023-06-01 16:36 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-01 17:04 ` Peter Xu
2023-06-01 23:00 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-01 23:43 ` Peter Xu
2023-07-10 9:35 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-07-10 9:40 ` Thomas Huth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZHjBw2E+eJKNsniO@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=leobras@redhat.com \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).