qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Beraldo Leal" <bleal@redhat.com>,
	"Wainer dos Santos Moschetta" <wainersm@redhat.com>,
	"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
	"Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
	"Michael Tokarev" <mjt@tls.msk.ru>,
	"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] gitlab: support disabling job auto-run in upstream
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 12:42:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZIG+n/NQG0auGL+w@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bae4ecb4-b03f-e1c4-d5cf-de3b591fe36a@linaro.org>

On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 09:04:34AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 5/26/23 03:19, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > +    # Upstream pipeline jobs start automatically unless told not to
> > +    # by setting QEMU_CI=1
> > +    - if: '$QEMU_CI == "1" && $CI_PROJECT_NAMESPACE == $QEMU_CI_UPSTREAM && $CI_COMMIT_BRANCH =~/staging/'
> > +      when: manual
> > +      variables:
> > +        QEMU_CI_CONTAINER_TAG: $CI_COMMIT_REF_SLUG
> 
> So.. in this case we don't want 'latest' for 'staging' because we may not
> run all jobs? Or should this have checked staging-X.Y, since the following
> rule will handle 'staging'?

Yes, this was a mistake. My original v1 was in fact correct.

With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|



  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-08 11:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-26 10:19 [PATCH v2 0/5] gitlab: improvements to handling of stable staging branches Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-05-26 10:19 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] gitlab: centralize the container tag name Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-05-26 10:19 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] gitlab: allow overriding name of the upstream repository Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-05-26 15:58   ` Richard Henderson
2023-05-26 10:19 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] gitlab: stable staging branches publish containers in a separate tag Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-05-26 15:59   ` Richard Henderson
2023-05-26 10:19 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] gitlab: avoid extra pipelines for tags and stable branches Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-05-26 16:00   ` Richard Henderson
2023-05-26 10:19 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] gitlab: support disabling job auto-run in upstream Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-05-26 16:04   ` Richard Henderson
2023-06-08 11:42     ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2023-05-30  7:36 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] gitlab: improvements to handling of stable staging branches Michael Tokarev
2023-05-30 10:56   ` Daniel P. Berrangé

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZIG+n/NQG0auGL+w@redhat.com \
    --to=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=bleal@redhat.com \
    --cc=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
    --cc=philmd@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=wainersm@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).