qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
	"Leonardo Bras" <leobras@redhat.com>,
	"Daniel P . Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
	qemu-block@nongnu.org, "Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	"Eric Blake" <eblake@redhat.com>, "Fam Zheng" <fam@euphon.net>,
	"Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
	libvir-list@redhat.com, "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 4/6] migration: Deprecate -incoming <uri>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 17:19:40 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZIeL7MGzKBv7CgZ2@x1n> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <875y7sflqb.fsf@secure.mitica>

On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 10:51:08PM +0200, Juan Quintela wrote:
> Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 09:33:42PM +0200, Juan Quintela wrote:
> >> Only "defer" is recommended.  After setting all migation parameters,
> >> start incoming migration with "migrate-incoming uri" command.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
> >> ---
> >>  docs/about/deprecated.rst | 7 +++++++
> >>  softmmu/vl.c              | 2 ++
> >>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/docs/about/deprecated.rst b/docs/about/deprecated.rst
> >> index 47e98dc95e..518672722d 100644
> >> --- a/docs/about/deprecated.rst
> >> +++ b/docs/about/deprecated.rst
> >> @@ -447,3 +447,10 @@ The new way to modify migration is using migration parameters.
> >>  ``blk`` functionality can be acchieved using
> >>  ``migrate_set_parameter block-incremental true``.
> >>  
> >> +``-incoming uri`` (since 8.1)
> >> +'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
> >> +
> >> +Everything except ``-incoming defer`` are deprecated.  This allows to
> >> +setup parameters before launching the proper migration with
> >> +``migrate-incoming uri``.
> >> +
> >> diff --git a/softmmu/vl.c b/softmmu/vl.c
> >> index b0b96f67fa..7fe865ab59 100644
> >> --- a/softmmu/vl.c
> >> +++ b/softmmu/vl.c
> >> @@ -2651,6 +2651,8 @@ void qmp_x_exit_preconfig(Error **errp)
> >>      if (incoming) {
> >>          Error *local_err = NULL;
> >>          if (strcmp(incoming, "defer") != 0) {
> >> +            warn_report("-incoming %s is deprecated, use -incoming defer and "
> >> +                        " set the uri with migrate-incoming.", incoming);
> >
> > I still use uri for all my scripts, alongside with "-global migration.xxx"
> > and it works.
> 
> You know what you are doing (TM).
> And remember that we don't support -gobal migration.x-foo.
> Yes, I know, we should drop the "x-" prefixes.

I hope they'll always be there. :) They're pretty handy for tests, when we
want to boot a VM without the need to script the sequences of qmp cmds.

Yes, we probably should just always drop the x-.  We can always declare
debugging purpose for all -global migration.* fields.

> 
> > Shall we just leave it there?  Or is deprecating it helps us in any form?
> 
> See the patches two weeks ago when people complained that lisen(.., num)
> was too low.  And there are other parameters that work the same way
> (that I convenientely had forgotten).  So the easiest way to get things
> right is to use "defer" always.  Using -incoming "uri" should only be
> for people that "know what they are doing", so we had to ways to do it:
> - review all migration options and see which ones work without defer
>   and document it
> - deprecate everything that is not defer.
> 
> Anything else is not going to be very user unfriendly.
> What do you think.

IIRC Wei Wang had a series just for that, so after that patchset applied we
should have fixed all issues cleanly?  Is there one more thing that's not
working right there?

> 
> Later, Juan.
> 
> PD.  This series are RFC for multiple reasons O:-)

Happy to know the rest (besides which I know will break my script :).

-- 
Peter Xu



  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-12 21:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-12 19:33 [RFC 0/6] Migration deprecated parts Juan Quintela
2023-06-12 19:33 ` [RFC 1/6] migration: skipped field is really obsolete Juan Quintela
2023-06-20 12:01   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-22 17:49     ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-12 19:33 ` [RFC 2/6] migration: migrate 'inc' command option is deprecated Juan Quintela
2023-06-20 12:05   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-22 18:11     ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-12 19:33 ` [RFC 3/6] migration: migrate 'blk' " Juan Quintela
2023-06-20 12:06   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-22 18:12     ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-12 19:33 ` [RFC 4/6] migration: Deprecate -incoming <uri> Juan Quintela
2023-06-12 19:41   ` Peter Xu
2023-06-12 20:51     ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-12 21:19       ` Peter Xu [this message]
2023-06-20 12:13         ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-22 19:34         ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-20 12:10       ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-20 14:45         ` Peter Xu
2023-06-22  8:28       ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-06-22  8:52         ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-22  9:22           ` Thomas Huth
2023-06-22 15:25             ` Peter Xu
2023-06-22 19:37               ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-22  9:45           ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-06-22 10:01             ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-22 15:24               ` Peter Xu
2023-06-22 16:03                 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-06-22  9:59           ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-22 15:54             ` Peter Xu
2023-06-22 16:33               ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-22 19:20                 ` Peter Xu
2023-06-23  7:17                   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-23 14:34                     ` Peter Xu
2023-06-23  8:23               ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-23 14:51                 ` Peter Xu
2023-06-23 15:03                   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-21  7:08   ` Thomas Huth
2023-06-22  2:22     ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-22  8:30     ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-06-22 18:12   ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-12 19:33 ` [RFC 5/6] migration: Deprecate block migration Juan Quintela
2023-06-21 11:45   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-06-22 18:17     ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-12 19:33 ` [RFC 6/6] migration: Deprecated old compression method Juan Quintela
2023-06-21  7:14   ` Thomas Huth
2023-06-22 19:21     ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-21 10:31   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-22 19:32     ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-13  7:48 ` [RFC 0/6] Migration deprecated parts Jiri Denemark

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZIeL7MGzKBv7CgZ2@x1n \
    --to=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=fam@euphon.net \
    --cc=leobras@redhat.com \
    --cc=libvir-list@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=quintela@redhat.com \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).