From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
"Leonardo Bras" <leobras@redhat.com>,
"Daniel P . Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, "Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
"Eric Blake" <eblake@redhat.com>, "Fam Zheng" <fam@euphon.net>,
"Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
libvir-list@redhat.com, "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 4/6] migration: Deprecate -incoming <uri>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 17:19:40 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZIeL7MGzKBv7CgZ2@x1n> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <875y7sflqb.fsf@secure.mitica>
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 10:51:08PM +0200, Juan Quintela wrote:
> Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 09:33:42PM +0200, Juan Quintela wrote:
> >> Only "defer" is recommended. After setting all migation parameters,
> >> start incoming migration with "migrate-incoming uri" command.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
> >> ---
> >> docs/about/deprecated.rst | 7 +++++++
> >> softmmu/vl.c | 2 ++
> >> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/docs/about/deprecated.rst b/docs/about/deprecated.rst
> >> index 47e98dc95e..518672722d 100644
> >> --- a/docs/about/deprecated.rst
> >> +++ b/docs/about/deprecated.rst
> >> @@ -447,3 +447,10 @@ The new way to modify migration is using migration parameters.
> >> ``blk`` functionality can be acchieved using
> >> ``migrate_set_parameter block-incremental true``.
> >>
> >> +``-incoming uri`` (since 8.1)
> >> +'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
> >> +
> >> +Everything except ``-incoming defer`` are deprecated. This allows to
> >> +setup parameters before launching the proper migration with
> >> +``migrate-incoming uri``.
> >> +
> >> diff --git a/softmmu/vl.c b/softmmu/vl.c
> >> index b0b96f67fa..7fe865ab59 100644
> >> --- a/softmmu/vl.c
> >> +++ b/softmmu/vl.c
> >> @@ -2651,6 +2651,8 @@ void qmp_x_exit_preconfig(Error **errp)
> >> if (incoming) {
> >> Error *local_err = NULL;
> >> if (strcmp(incoming, "defer") != 0) {
> >> + warn_report("-incoming %s is deprecated, use -incoming defer and "
> >> + " set the uri with migrate-incoming.", incoming);
> >
> > I still use uri for all my scripts, alongside with "-global migration.xxx"
> > and it works.
>
> You know what you are doing (TM).
> And remember that we don't support -gobal migration.x-foo.
> Yes, I know, we should drop the "x-" prefixes.
I hope they'll always be there. :) They're pretty handy for tests, when we
want to boot a VM without the need to script the sequences of qmp cmds.
Yes, we probably should just always drop the x-. We can always declare
debugging purpose for all -global migration.* fields.
>
> > Shall we just leave it there? Or is deprecating it helps us in any form?
>
> See the patches two weeks ago when people complained that lisen(.., num)
> was too low. And there are other parameters that work the same way
> (that I convenientely had forgotten). So the easiest way to get things
> right is to use "defer" always. Using -incoming "uri" should only be
> for people that "know what they are doing", so we had to ways to do it:
> - review all migration options and see which ones work without defer
> and document it
> - deprecate everything that is not defer.
>
> Anything else is not going to be very user unfriendly.
> What do you think.
IIRC Wei Wang had a series just for that, so after that patchset applied we
should have fixed all issues cleanly? Is there one more thing that's not
working right there?
>
> Later, Juan.
>
> PD. This series are RFC for multiple reasons O:-)
Happy to know the rest (besides which I know will break my script :).
--
Peter Xu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-12 21:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-12 19:33 [RFC 0/6] Migration deprecated parts Juan Quintela
2023-06-12 19:33 ` [RFC 1/6] migration: skipped field is really obsolete Juan Quintela
2023-06-20 12:01 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-22 17:49 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-12 19:33 ` [RFC 2/6] migration: migrate 'inc' command option is deprecated Juan Quintela
2023-06-20 12:05 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-22 18:11 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-12 19:33 ` [RFC 3/6] migration: migrate 'blk' " Juan Quintela
2023-06-20 12:06 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-22 18:12 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-12 19:33 ` [RFC 4/6] migration: Deprecate -incoming <uri> Juan Quintela
2023-06-12 19:41 ` Peter Xu
2023-06-12 20:51 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-12 21:19 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2023-06-20 12:13 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-22 19:34 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-20 12:10 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-20 14:45 ` Peter Xu
2023-06-22 8:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-06-22 8:52 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-22 9:22 ` Thomas Huth
2023-06-22 15:25 ` Peter Xu
2023-06-22 19:37 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-22 9:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-06-22 10:01 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-22 15:24 ` Peter Xu
2023-06-22 16:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-06-22 9:59 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-22 15:54 ` Peter Xu
2023-06-22 16:33 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-22 19:20 ` Peter Xu
2023-06-23 7:17 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-23 14:34 ` Peter Xu
2023-06-23 8:23 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-23 14:51 ` Peter Xu
2023-06-23 15:03 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-21 7:08 ` Thomas Huth
2023-06-22 2:22 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-22 8:30 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-06-22 18:12 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-12 19:33 ` [RFC 5/6] migration: Deprecate block migration Juan Quintela
2023-06-21 11:45 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-06-22 18:17 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-12 19:33 ` [RFC 6/6] migration: Deprecated old compression method Juan Quintela
2023-06-21 7:14 ` Thomas Huth
2023-06-22 19:21 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-21 10:31 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-06-22 19:32 ` Juan Quintela
2023-06-13 7:48 ` [RFC 0/6] Migration deprecated parts Jiri Denemark
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZIeL7MGzKBv7CgZ2@x1n \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=fam@euphon.net \
--cc=leobras@redhat.com \
--cc=libvir-list@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).