From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Juan Quintela" <quintela@redhat.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Avihai Horon" <avihaih@nvidia.com>,
"Leonardo Bras Soares Passos" <lsoaresp@redhat.com>,
"Laurent Vivier" <lvivier@redhat.com>,
"Daniel P . Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Eric Blake" <eblake@redhat.com>,
"Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] migration: switchover-hold parameter
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2023 09:54:31 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZKbHl7uKI/NOAfMQ@x1n> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87v8exqhx6.fsf@pond.sub.org>
Hi, Markus,
On Thu, Jul 06, 2023 at 03:38:13PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > Add a new migration parameter switchover-hold which can block src qemu
> > migration from switching over to dest from running.
> >
> > One can set this flag to true so src qemu will keep iterating the VM data,
> > not switching over to dest even if it can.
> >
> > It means now live migration works somehow like COLO; we keep syncing data
> > from src to dst without stopping.
>
> Out of curiosity: does it share code with COLO?
Nop, it is still purely the migration path.
>
> > When the user is ready for the switchover, one can set the parameter from
> > true->false. That'll contain a implicit kick to migration thread to be
> > alive and re-evaluate the switchover decision.
> >
> > This can be used in two cases so far in my mind:
> >
> > (1) One can use this parameter to start pre-heating migration (but not
> > really migrating, so a migrate-cancel will cancel the preheat). When
> > the user wants to really migrate, just clear the flag. It'll in most
> > cases migrate immediately because most pages are already synced.
> >
> > (2) Can also be used as a clean way to do qtest, in many of the precopy
> > tests we have requirement to run after 1 iteration without completing
> > the precopy migration. Before that we have either set bandwidth to
> > ridiculous low value, or tricks on detecting guest memory change over
> > some adhoc guest memory position. Now we can simply set this flag
> > then we know precopy won't complete and will just keep going.
> >
> > Here we leveraged a sem to make sure migration thread won't busy spin on a
> > physical cpu, meanwhile provide a timedwait() of 10ms so it can still try
> > its best to sync with dest QEMU from time to time. Note that the sem is
> > prone to outdated counts but it's benign, please refer to the comment above
> > the semaphore definition for more information.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > qapi/migration.json | 25 ++++++++++--
> > migration/migration.h | 17 +++++++++
> > migration/migration-hmp-cmds.c | 7 ++++
> > migration/migration.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > migration/options.c | 17 +++++++++
> > 5 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/qapi/migration.json b/qapi/migration.json
> > index 47dfef0278..c050081555 100644
> > --- a/qapi/migration.json
> > +++ b/qapi/migration.json
> > @@ -789,6 +789,15 @@
> > # Nodes are mapped to their block device name if there is one, and
> > # to their node name otherwise. (Since 5.2)
> > #
> > +# @switchover-hold: Whether we should hold-off precopy switchover from
> > +# src to dest QEMU, even if we can finish migration in the
>
> Spell out "source" and "destination", please.
>
> Recommend to spell it out in the commit message, too.
Will do.
>
> > +# downtime specified. By default off, so precopy migration will
> > +# complete as soon as possible. One can set it to explicitly keep
> > +# iterating during precopy migration until set the flag to false
> > +# again to kick off the final switchover. Note, this does not
>
> "until the flag is set to false again"
>
> or
>
> "until the flag is cleared".
Will do.
>
> > +# affect postcopy switchover, because the user can control that
> > +# using "migrate-start-postcopy" command explicitly. (Since 8.1)
> > +#
> > # Features:
> > #
> > # @unstable: Member @x-checkpoint-delay is experimental.
> > @@ -810,7 +819,7 @@
> > 'xbzrle-cache-size', 'max-postcopy-bandwidth',
> > 'max-cpu-throttle', 'multifd-compression',
> > 'multifd-zlib-level' ,'multifd-zstd-level',
> > - 'block-bitmap-mapping' ] }
> > + 'block-bitmap-mapping', 'switchover-hold' ] }
> >
> > ##
> > # @MigrateSetParameters:
> > @@ -945,6 +954,10 @@
> > # Nodes are mapped to their block device name if there is one, and
> > # to their node name otherwise. (Since 5.2)
> > #
> > +# @switchover-hold: Whether we should hold-off precopy switchover from
> > +# src to dest QEMU. For more details, please refer to
> > +# MigrationParameter entry of the same field. (Since 8.1)
>
> We normally duplicate the documentation. This would be the first
> instance where we reference instead. Do we want that?
Personally I'd hope to try avoid any form of duplication if possible. We
have some structure duplications that I cannot avoid (not until someone,
including myself, can dedup it..), so I tried to not duplicate exactly same
thing in the documents at least, instead to put such a reference.
But I agree only referencing other docs in this flag is special. We may
want to do at least the same across all the parameters. I have no strong
opinion either, so if we want to keep full descriptions in multiple places
I'll do that in the new spin. It's more QAPI stuff IMHO; I'll just follow
your advise.
Thanks for taking a look!
--
Peter Xu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-06 13:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-06 12:43 [PATCH v5 0/2] migration: switchover-hold flag Peter Xu
2023-07-06 12:43 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] migration: switchover-hold parameter Peter Xu
2023-07-06 13:29 ` Avihai Horon
2023-07-06 13:44 ` Peter Xu
2023-07-06 13:48 ` Avihai Horon
2023-07-06 13:38 ` Markus Armbruster
2023-07-06 13:54 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2023-07-06 12:43 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] qtest/migration: Use switchover-hold to speedup Peter Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZKbHl7uKI/NOAfMQ@x1n \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=avihaih@nvidia.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=lsoaresp@redhat.com \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).