From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>,
Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] migration: Stop marking RP bad after shutdown
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 17:37:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZMQ1LbTl5kGmAG21@x1n> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230728121516.16258-2-farosas@suse.de>
On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 09:15:14AM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> When waiting for the return path (RP) thread to finish, there is
> really nothing wrong in the RP if the destination end of the migration
> stops responding, leaving it stuck.
>
> Stop returning an error at that point and leave it to other parts of
> the code to catch. One such part is the very next routine run by
> migration_completion() which checks 'to_dst_file' for an error and fails
> the migration. Another is the RP thread itself when the recvmsg()
> returns an error.
>
> With this we stop marking RP bad from outside of the thread and can
> reuse await_return_path_close_on_source() in the next patches to wait
> on the thread during a paused migration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
> ---
> migration/migration.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/migration/migration.c b/migration/migration.c
> index 91bba630a8..051067f8c5 100644
> --- a/migration/migration.c
> +++ b/migration/migration.c
> @@ -2049,7 +2049,6 @@ static int await_return_path_close_on_source(MigrationState *ms)
> * waiting for the destination.
> */
> qemu_file_shutdown(ms->rp_state.from_dst_file);
> - mark_source_rp_bad(ms);
> }
> trace_await_return_path_close_on_source_joining();
> qemu_thread_join(&ms->rp_state.rp_thread);
The retval of await_return_path_close_on_source() relies on
ms->rp_state.error. If mark_source_rp_bad() is dropped, is it possible
that it'll start to return succeed where it used to return failure?
Maybe not a big deal: I see migration_completion() also has another
qemu_file_get_error() later to catch errors, but I don't know how solid
that is.
I think as long as after this patch we can fail properly on e.g. network
failures for precopy when cap return-path=on, then we should be good.
--
Peter Xu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-28 22:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-28 12:15 [PATCH 0/3] Fix segfault on migration return path Fabiano Rosas
2023-07-28 12:15 ` [PATCH 1/3] migration: Stop marking RP bad after shutdown Fabiano Rosas
2023-07-28 21:37 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2023-07-31 21:02 ` Fabiano Rosas
2023-07-31 21:13 ` Fabiano Rosas
2023-07-28 12:15 ` [PATCH 2/3] migration: Simplify calling of await_return_path_close_on_source Fabiano Rosas
2023-07-28 21:39 ` Peter Xu
2023-07-31 12:42 ` Fabiano Rosas
2023-07-31 17:06 ` Peter Xu
2023-07-28 12:15 ` [PATCH 3/3] migration: Replace the return path retry logic Fabiano Rosas
2023-07-28 21:45 ` Peter Xu
2023-07-31 13:04 ` Fabiano Rosas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZMQ1LbTl5kGmAG21@x1n \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=farosas@suse.de \
--cc=leobras@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).