From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] block-backend: process I/O in the current AioContext
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 17:24:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZN+NJvs0G4zvbOJB@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230815160521.3357063-1-stefanha@redhat.com>
Am 15.08.2023 um 18:05 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> Switch blk_aio_*() APIs over to multi-queue by using
> qemu_get_current_aio_context() instead of blk_get_aio_context(). This change
> will allow devices to process I/O in multiple IOThreads in the future.
Both code paths still use blk_aio_em_aiocb_info, which is:
static AioContext *blk_aio_em_aiocb_get_aio_context(BlockAIOCB *acb_)
{
BlkAioEmAIOCB *acb = container_of(acb_, BlkAioEmAIOCB, common);
return blk_get_aio_context(acb->rwco.blk);
}
static const AIOCBInfo blk_aio_em_aiocb_info = {
.aiocb_size = sizeof(BlkAioEmAIOCB),
.get_aio_context = blk_aio_em_aiocb_get_aio_context,
};
.get_aio_context() is called by bdrv_aio_cancel(), which already looks
wrong before this patch because in theory it can end up polling the
AioContext of a different thread. After this patch, .get_aio_context()
doesn't even necessarily return the AioContext that runs the request any
more.
The only thing that might save us is that I can't find any device that
both supports iothreads and calls bdrv_aio_cancel(). But we shouldn't
rely on that.
Maybe the solution is to just remove .get_aio_context altogether and use
AIO_WAIT_WHILE(NULL, ...) in bdrv_aio_cancel().
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-18 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-15 16:05 [PATCH 0/2] block-backend: process I/O in the current AioContext Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-08-15 16:05 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-08-15 16:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] block-backend: process zoned requests " Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-08-18 15:24 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2023-08-21 15:17 ` [PATCH 0/2] block-backend: process I/O " Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZN+NJvs0G4zvbOJB@redhat.com \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=hreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).