qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: "Marc-André Lureau" <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Marc Hartmayer" <mhartmay@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] chardev/char-pty: Avoid losing bytes when the other side just (re-)connected
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 11:32:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZN33W+LhAn2FrFDT@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230816210743.1319018-1-thuth@redhat.com>

On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 11:07:43PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> When starting a guest via libvirt with "virsh start --console ...",
> the first second of the console output is missing. This is especially
> annoying on s390x that only has a text console by default and no graphical
> output - if the bios fails to boot here, the information about what went
> wrong is completely lost.
> 
> One part of the problem (there is also some things to be done on the
> libvirt side) is that QEMU only checks with a 1 second timer whether
> the other side of the pty is already connected, so the first second of
> the console output is always lost.
> 
> This likely used to work better in the past, since the code once checked
> for a re-connection during write, but this has been removed in commit
> f8278c7d74 ("char-pty: remove the check for connection on write") to avoid
> some locking.
> 
> To ease the situation here at least a little bit, let's check with g_poll()
> whether we could send out the data anyway, even if the connection has not
> been marked as "connected" yet. The file descriptor is marked as non-blocking
> anyway since commit fac6688a18 ("Do not hang on full PTY"), so this should
> not cause any trouble if the other side is not ready for receiving yet.
> 
> With this patch applied, I can now successfully see the bios output of
> a s390x guest when running it with "virsh start --console" (with a patched
> version of virsh that fixes the remaining issues there, too).
> 
> Reported-by: Marc Hartmayer <mhartmay@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> ---
>  chardev/char-pty.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/chardev/char-pty.c b/chardev/char-pty.c
> index 4e5deac18a..fad12dfef3 100644
> --- a/chardev/char-pty.c
> +++ b/chardev/char-pty.c
> @@ -106,11 +106,27 @@ static void pty_chr_update_read_handler(Chardev *chr)
>  static int char_pty_chr_write(Chardev *chr, const uint8_t *buf, int len)
>  {
>      PtyChardev *s = PTY_CHARDEV(chr);
> +    GPollFD pfd;
> +    int rc;
>  
> -    if (!s->connected) {
> -        return len;
> +    if (s->connected) {
> +        return io_channel_send(s->ioc, buf, len);
>      }
> -    return io_channel_send(s->ioc, buf, len);
> +
> +    /*
> +     * The other side might already be re-connected, but the timer might
> +     * not have fired yet. So let's check here whether we can write again:
> +     */
> +    pfd.fd = QIO_CHANNEL_FILE(s->ioc)->fd;
> +    pfd.events = G_IO_OUT;
> +    pfd.revents = 0;
> +    rc = RETRY_ON_EINTR(g_poll(&pfd, 1, 0));
> +    g_assert(rc >= 0);
> +    if (!(pfd.revents & G_IO_HUP) && (pfd.revents & G_IO_OUT)) {

Should (can?) we call

   pty_chr_state(chr, 1);

here ?


> +        io_channel_send(s->ioc, buf, len);

As it feels a little dirty to be sending data before setting the
'connected == 1' and thus issuing the 'CHR_EVENT_OPENED' event 

> +    }
> +
> +    return len;
>  }
>  
>  static GSource *pty_chr_add_watch(Chardev *chr, GIOCondition cond)

With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|



  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-17 10:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-16 21:07 [PATCH] chardev/char-pty: Avoid losing bytes when the other side just (re-)connected Thomas Huth
2023-08-17 10:32 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2023-08-17 12:00   ` Thomas Huth
2023-08-17 13:06     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-08-17 13:47       ` Marc-André Lureau
2023-08-17 17:09         ` Thomas Huth
2023-08-28 12:23           ` Thomas Huth
2023-09-28  5:18             ` Thomas Huth
2023-08-23  9:44 ` Amaury Pouly
2023-09-28 11:10 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-03-12 12:18 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-03-12 12:29   ` Thomas Huth
2025-03-12 14:17     ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZN33W+LhAn2FrFDT@redhat.com \
    --to=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=marcandre.lureau@redhat.com \
    --cc=mhartmay@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).