From: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>
To: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Cc: QEMU Development <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PULL 1/1] target/openrisc: Set EPCR to next PC on FPE exceptions
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 20:50:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZNU/hbdfbAOzp95u@antec> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a5dc02df-158e-4ff8-fce9-e2ec7df980ad@tls.msk.ru>
On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 09:35:18AM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> 09.08.2023 23:34, Stafford Horne пишет:
> > The architecture specification calls for the EPCR to be set to "Address
> > of next not executed instruction" when there is a floating point
> > exception (FPE). This was not being done, so fix it by using the same
> > pattern as syscall. Also, we move this logic down to be done for
> > instructions not in the delay slot as called for by the architecture
> > manual.
> >
> > Without this patch FPU exceptions will loop, as the exception handling
> > will always return back to the failed floating point instruction.
> >
> > This was not noticed in earlier testing because:
> >
> > 1. The compiler usually generates code which clobbers the input operand
> > such as:
> >
> > lf.div.s r19,r17,r19
> >
> > 2. The target will store the operation output before to the register
> > before handling the exception. So an operation such as:
> >
> > float a = 100.0f;
> > float b = 0.0f;
> > float c = a / b; /* lf.div.s r19,r17,r19 */
> >
> > Will first execute:
> >
> > 100 / 0 -> Store inf to c (r19)
> > -> triggering divide by zero exception
> > -> handle and return
> >
> > Then it will execute:
> >
> > 100 / inf -> Store 0 to c (no exception)
> >
> > To confirm the looping behavior and the fix I used the following:
> >
> > float fpu_div(float a, float b) {
> > float c;
> > asm volatile("lf.div.s %0, %1, %2"
> > : "+r" (c)
> > : "r" (a), "r" (b));
> > return c;
> > }
>
> Is it a -stable material? It applies cleanly to 8.0 and 7.2.
> Or maybe it is not needed on older versions, not being noticed before?
I would say no, it will work on 8.0 an 7.2 but this code path is not very useful
withouth the other 8.1 Floating Point Exception handling updates.
-Stafford
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-10 19:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-09 20:34 [PULL 0/1] OpenRISC FPU Fix for 8.1 Stafford Horne
2023-08-09 20:34 ` [PULL 1/1] target/openrisc: Set EPCR to next PC on FPE exceptions Stafford Horne
2023-08-10 6:35 ` Michael Tokarev
2023-08-10 19:50 ` Stafford Horne [this message]
2023-08-11 5:13 ` Michael Tokarev
2023-08-10 1:15 ` [PULL 0/1] OpenRISC FPU Fix for 8.1 Richard Henderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZNU/hbdfbAOzp95u@antec \
--to=shorne@gmail.com \
--cc=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).