qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Cc: Guoyi Tu <tugy@chinatelecom.cn>,
	Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>,
	Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] migrate/ram: let ram_save_target_page_legacy() return if qemu file got error
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 10:48:24 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZNzhuF7fRUdaGthV@x1n> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87350klygf.fsf@suse.de>

On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 07:42:24PM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> Yep, I see that. I meant explicitly move the code into the loop. Feels a
> bit weird to check the QEMUFile for errors first thing inside the
> function when nothing around it should have touched the QEMUFile.

Valid point.  This reminded me that now we have one indirection into
->ram_save_target_page() which is a hook now.  Putting in the caller will
work for all hooks, even though they're not yet exist.

But since we don't have any other hooks yet, it'll be the same for now.

Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>

For the long term: there's one more reason to rework qemu_put_byte()/... to
return error codes.. Then things like save_normal_page() can simply already
return negatives when hit an error.

Fabiano - I see that you've done quite a few patches in reworking migration
code.  I had that for a long time in my todo, but if you're interested feel
free to look into it.

IIUC the idea is introducing another similar layer of API for qemufile (I'd
call it qemu_put_1|2|4|8(), or anything you can come up better with..) then
let migration to switch over to it, with retval reflecting errors.  Then we
should be able to drop this patch along with most of the explicit error
checks for the qemufile spread all over.

-- 
Peter Xu



  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-16 14:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-15  7:21 [PATCH] migrate/ram: let ram_save_target_page_legacy() return if qemu file got error Guoyi Tu
2023-08-15 12:35 ` Fabiano Rosas
2023-08-15 22:19   ` Peter Xu
2023-08-15 22:42     ` Fabiano Rosas
2023-08-16 14:48       ` Peter Xu [this message]
2023-08-16 15:15         ` Fabiano Rosas
2023-08-17  2:19           ` Guoyi Tu
2023-08-17 13:35             ` Peter Xu
2023-08-17 14:29               ` Guoyi Tu
2023-08-17 14:32           ` Guoyi Tu
2023-08-16  2:09     ` Guoyi Tu
     [not found] ` <1289281636.5044.1692148361356.JavaMail.root@jt-retransmission-dep-56f978df86-2gmr2>
2023-08-16  2:01   ` Guoyi Tu
2023-08-16 12:18 ` Fabiano Rosas
2023-09-04 11:55 ` Guoyi Tu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZNzhuF7fRUdaGthV@x1n \
    --to=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=farosas@suse.de \
    --cc=leobras@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=quintela@redhat.com \
    --cc=tugy@chinatelecom.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).