qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: "Wang, Lei" <lei4.wang@intel.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Zhiyi Guo <zhguo@redhat.com>,
	Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
	Leonardo Bras Soares Passos <lsoaresp@redhat.com>,
	Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>,
	Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>,
	Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>,
	Chensheng Dong <chdong@redhat.com>,
	Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-8.2 v2 2/2] migration: Allow user to specify migration switchover bandwidth
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2023 12:46:03 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZPdbS1pyl5Pzjh4T@x1n> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZPGizMa52LF7Qek1@redhat.com>

On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 09:37:32AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > When the user wants to have migration only use 5Gbps out of that 10Gbps,
> > > one can set max-bandwidth to 5Gbps, along with max-switchover-bandwidth to
> > > 5Gbps so it'll never use over 5Gbps too (so the user can have the rest
> > 
> > Hi Peter. I'm curious if we specify max-switchover-bandwidth to 5Gbps over a
> > 10Gbps network, in the completion stage will it send the remaining data in 5Gbps
> > using downtime_limit time or in 10Gbps (saturate the network) using the
> > downtime_limit / 2 time? Seems this parameter won't rate limit the final stage:)
> 
> Effectively the mgmt app is telling QEMU to assume that this
> much bandwidth is available for use during switchover. If QEMU
> determines that, given this available bandwidth, the remaining
> data can be sent over the link within the downtime limit, it
> will perform the switchover. When sending this sitchover data,
> it will actually transmit the data at full line rate IIUC.

I'm right at reposting this patch, but then I found that the
max-available-bandwidth is indeed confusing (as Lei's question shows).

We do have all the bandwidth throttling values in the pattern of
max-*-bandwidth and this one will start to be the outlier that it won't
really throttle the network.

If the old name "available-bandwidth" is too general, I'm now considering
"avail-switchover-bandwidth" just to leave max- out of the name to
differenciate, if some day we want to add a real throttle for switchover we
can still have a sane name.

Any objections before I repost?

Thanks,

-- 
Peter Xu



  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-09-05 16:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-03 15:53 [PATCH for-8.2 v2 0/2] migration: Add max-switchover-bandwidth parameter Peter Xu
2023-08-03 15:53 ` [PATCH for-8.2 v2 1/2] qapi/migration: Deduplicate migration parameter field comments Peter Xu
2023-08-04 12:28   ` Markus Armbruster
2023-08-04 13:59     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-08-04 16:01       ` Peter Xu
2023-08-04 16:29         ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-08-04 16:46           ` Peter Xu
2023-08-04 16:48             ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-08-04 21:02               ` Peter Xu
2023-08-05  8:12                 ` Markus Armbruster
2023-08-06 15:49                   ` Peter Xu
2023-08-08 20:03                     ` Peter Xu
2023-08-14 22:24                       ` Peter Xu
2023-08-03 15:53 ` [PATCH for-8.2 v2 2/2] migration: Allow user to specify migration switchover bandwidth Peter Xu
2023-08-31 18:14   ` Joao Martins
2023-08-31 18:34     ` Peter Xu
2023-09-01  6:55   ` Wang, Lei
2023-09-01  8:37     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-09-01 14:40       ` Peter Xu
2023-09-05 16:46       ` Peter Xu [this message]
2023-09-05 17:39         ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-09-06  2:27         ` Wang, Lei
2023-09-01 17:59   ` Joao Martins
2023-09-01 18:39     ` Joao Martins
2023-09-05 15:31       ` Peter Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZPdbS1pyl5Pzjh4T@x1n \
    --to=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=chdong@redhat.com \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=farosas@suse.de \
    --cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
    --cc=lei4.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=lsoaresp@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=quintela@redhat.com \
    --cc=zhguo@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).