From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48CCBEB8FD7 for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 11:50:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qea04-00051u-7J; Fri, 08 Sep 2023 07:50:12 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qea01-00051a-RS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Sep 2023 07:50:09 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qeZzw-00048X-LJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Sep 2023 07:50:06 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1694173803; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=3l2cFvteoYpgR/X28lBobIZkPTxlhpwOsDgfcoY1pK4=; b=CTN/i45O4uw7glCRAKV2hvdyR/fDqsNt2HpD+pBM9VRVP2Kakdy3cpVAPwSPbuRLDXZPQu zx5UDXYza9Ss8HGNw7kjleIx71iroi1Vbinup8vumyezZf+vnTpMDNXfe21167FL1F0uIj LApYZYUJg+KqN1EDm8QwTzz4wQcGq7Q= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx-ext.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-484-AmQXeNxYPFCRkpptZSIRpA-1; Fri, 08 Sep 2023 07:50:00 -0400 X-MC-Unique: AmQXeNxYPFCRkpptZSIRpA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FED4282055E; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 11:50:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (unknown [10.42.28.42]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6999E63F78; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 11:49:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2023 12:49:36 +0100 From: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= To: Ilya Maximets Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi , Jason Wang , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [PULL 00/17] Net patches Message-ID: References: <20230908064507.14596-1-jasowang@redhat.com> <1186b0b7-7dc5-d926-e6ff-ba3da2238b9c@ovn.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1186b0b7-7dc5-d926-e6ff-ba3da2238b9c@ovn.org> User-Agent: Mutt/2.2.9 (2022-11-12) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.5 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=berrange@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org On Fri, Sep 08, 2023 at 01:34:54PM +0200, Ilya Maximets wrote: > On 9/8/23 13:19, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > Hi Ilya and Jason, > > There is a CI failure related to a missing Debian libxdp-dev package: > > https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/jobs/5046139967 > > > > I think the issue is that the debian-amd64 container image that QEMU > > uses for testing is based on Debian 11 ("bullseye" aka "oldstable") > > and libxdp is not available on that release: > > https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=libxdp&searchon=names&suite=oldstable§ion=all > > Hmm. Sorry about that. > > > > > If we need to support Debian 11 CI then either XDP could be disabled > > for that distro or libxdp could be compiled from source. > > I'd suggest we just remove the attempt to install the package for now, > building libxdp from sources may be a little painful to maintain. > > Can be re-added later once distributions with libxdp 1.4+ will be more > widely available, i.e. when fedora dockerfile will be updated to 39, > for example. That should be soon-ish, right? If you follow the process in docs/devel/testing.rst for adding libxdp in libvirt-ci, then lcitool will "do the right thing" when we move the auto-generated dockerfiles to new distro versions. With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|