qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Cc: "Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	"Wainer dos Santos Moschetta" <wainersm@redhat.com>,
	"Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
	"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
	"Beraldo Leal" <bleal@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gitlab: remove unreliable avocado CI jobs
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 17:14:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZQCOTJMyMCgNCu3l@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8734zjv0ph.fsf@linaro.org>

On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 05:01:26PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
> 
> Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes:
> 
> > On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 11:06:11AM -0400, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> >> The avocado-system-alpine, avocado-system-fedora, and
> >> avocado-system-ubuntu jobs are unreliable. I identified them while
> >> looking over CI failures from the past week:
> >> https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/jobs/5058610614
> >> https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/jobs/5058610654
> >> https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/jobs/5030428571
> >> 
> >> Thomas Huth suggest on IRC today that there may be a legitimate failure
> >> in there:
> >> 
> >>   th_huth: f4bug, yes, seems like it does not start at all correctly on
> >>   alpine anymore ... and it's broken since ~ 2 weeks already, so if nobody
> >>   noticed this by now, this is worrying
> >> 
> >> It crept in because the jobs were already unreliable.
> >> 
> >> I don't know how to interpret the job output, so all I can do is to
> >> propose removing these jobs. A useful CI job has two outcomes: pass or
> >> fail. Timeouts and other in-between states are not useful because they
> >> require constant triaging by someone who understands the details of the
> >> tests and they can occur when run against pull requests that have
> >> nothing to do with the area covered by the test.
> >> 
> >> Hopefully test owners will be able to identify the root causes and solve
> >> them so that these jobs can stay. In their current state the jobs are
> >> not useful since I cannot cannot tell whether job failures are real or
> >> just intermittent when merging qemu.git pull requests.
> >> 
> >> If you are a test owner, please take a look.
> >> 
> >> It is likely that other avocado-system-* CI jobs have similar failures
> >> from time to time, but I'll leave them as long as they are passing.
> >> 
> >> Buglink: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/1884
> >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
> >> ---
> >>  .gitlab-ci.d/buildtest.yml | 27 ---------------------------
> >>  1 file changed, 27 deletions(-)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/.gitlab-ci.d/buildtest.yml b/.gitlab-ci.d/buildtest.yml
> >> index aee9101507..83ce448c4d 100644
> >> --- a/.gitlab-ci.d/buildtest.yml
> >> +++ b/.gitlab-ci.d/buildtest.yml
> >> @@ -22,15 +22,6 @@ check-system-alpine:
> >>      IMAGE: alpine
> >>      MAKE_CHECK_ARGS: check-unit check-qtest
> >>  
> >> -avocado-system-alpine:
> >> -  extends: .avocado_test_job_template
> >> -  needs:
> >> -    - job: build-system-alpine
> >> -      artifacts: true
> >> -  variables:
> >> -    IMAGE: alpine
> >> -    MAKE_CHECK_ARGS: check-avocado
> >
> > Instead of entirely deleting, I'd suggest adding
> >
> >    # Disabled due to frequent random failures
> >    # https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/1884
> >    when: manual
> >
> > See example: https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/ci/yaml/#when
> >
> > This disables the job from running unless someone explicitly
> > tells it to run
> 
> What I don't understand is why we didn't gate the release back when they
> first tripped. We should have noticed between:
> 
>   https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/pipelines/956543770
> 
> and
> 
>   https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/pipelines/957154381
> 
> that the system tests where regressing. Yet we merged the changes
> anyway.

I think that green series is misleading, based on Richard's
mail on list wrt the TCG pull series:

  https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2023-08/msg04014.html

  "It's some sort of timing issue, which sometimes goes away
   when re-run. I was re-running tests *a lot* in order to
   get them to go green while running the 8.1 release. "


Essentially I'd put this down to the tests being soo non-deterministic
that we've given up trusting them.

With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|



  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-12 16:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-12 15:06 [PATCH] gitlab: remove unreliable avocado CI jobs Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-09-12 15:20 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-09-12 16:01   ` Alex Bennée
2023-09-12 16:14     ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2023-09-12 16:19       ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-09-12 17:39         ` Alex Bennée
2023-09-12 18:52           ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2023-09-12 19:58 ` Thomas Huth
2023-09-13  6:43   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-09-13  9:18   ` Peter Maydell
2023-09-13  9:45     ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-09-13 10:35       ` Alex Bennée
2023-09-13 10:39         ` Daniel P. Berrangé

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZQCOTJMyMCgNCu3l@redhat.com \
    --to=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=bleal@redhat.com \
    --cc=philmd@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=wainersm@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).