From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
"Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
"QEMU Developers" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Wshadow: Better name for 'optarg'?
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2023 09:44:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZR53h75UYpSCdp7k@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87lechabs2.fsf@pond.sub.org>
On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 07:17:17AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> writes:
>
> > On 4/10/23 19:35, Thomas Huth wrote:
> >> On 04/10/2023 19.23, Richard Henderson wrote:
> >>> On 10/4/23 03:05, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm getting a bunch of errors for 'optarg' declared in <unistd.h>:
> >>>
> >>> I thought things like this is why we were trying -Wshadow=local.
> >>>
> >>> I think it's unlikely that we'll be able to prevent all such cases.
> >> Given the broad range of operating systems and libraries that we support in QEMU, I agree with Richard - it will likely be impossible to enable that option without =local by default without risking that compilation breaks on some exotic systems or new versions of various libraries.
> >
> > -Wshadow=local doesn't seem to work here which is why I switched
> > to -Wshadow. I probably misunderstood something from Markus cover
> > letter. My setup is:
> >
> > C compiler for the host machine: clang (clang 14.0.3 "Apple clang version 14.0.3 (clang-1403.0.22.14.1)")
> >
> > I suppose we'll figure that out when eventually enabling -Wshadow=local
> > on CI. Meanwhile I already cleaned the 'optarg' warnings that were
> > bugging me, see:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20231004120019.93101-1-philmd@linaro.org/
> > I'll try to get -Wshadow=local, but the other series still seems a
> > good cleanup, as I used more meaningful variable names.
>
> I'm aiming just for -Wshadow=local now. If somebody else gets us all
> the way to -Wshadow, I'll clap from the sidelines.
>
> I'm mildly skeptical about -Wshadow without =local when targeting a wide
> range of toolchains over a long time.
We don't need to claim that QEMU will build warning-free on all possible
toolchains, only our CI covered platforms get that expectation. If users
see warnings on untested toolchains they can either send further patches,
or turn off -Werror, and/or contribute to CI coverage.
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-05 8:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-04 10:05 Wshadow: Better name for 'optarg'? Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-10-04 10:15 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-10-04 13:14 ` Warner Losh
2023-10-04 17:23 ` Richard Henderson
2023-10-04 17:35 ` Thomas Huth
2023-10-04 17:43 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-10-04 17:47 ` Warner Losh
2023-10-04 17:56 ` Thomas Huth
2023-10-04 18:02 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-10-05 6:56 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-10-05 5:17 ` Markus Armbruster
2023-10-05 6:52 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-10-05 8:44 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2023-10-05 8:50 ` Claudio Fontana
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZR53h75UYpSCdp7k@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).