qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
To: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "David Hildenbrand" <david@redhat.com>,
	"Weiwei Li" <liweiwei@iscas.ac.cn>,
	qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, "Ilya Leoshkevich" <iii@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Bin Meng" <bin.meng@windriver.com>,
	"Alistair Francis" <alistair.francis@wdc.com>,
	"Cameron Esfahani" <dirty@apple.com>,
	qemu-ppc@nongnu.org,
	"Daniel Henrique Barboza" <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>,
	qemu-riscv@nongnu.org, "Max Filippov" <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>,
	"Daniel Henrique Barboza" <danielhb413@gmail.com>,
	"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	"Cédric Le Goater" <clg@kaod.org>,
	"Liu Zhiwei" <zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com>,
	"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
	"Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
	"Roman Bolshakov" <rbolshakov@ddn.com>,
	"Nicholas Piggin" <npiggin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] target/i386: Use env_archcpu() in simulate_[rdmsr/wrmsr]()
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 17:14:26 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZTJE8kPBnCn3luEE@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231009110239.66778-7-philmd@linaro.org>

On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 01:02:39PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Date: Mon,  9 Oct 2023 13:02:39 +0200
> From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
> Subject: [PATCH 6/6] target/i386: Use env_archcpu() in
>  simulate_[rdmsr/wrmsr]()
> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.41.0
> 
> When CPUArchState* is available (here CPUX86State*), we can
> use the fast env_archcpu() macro to get ArchCPU* (here X86CPU*).
> The QOM cast X86_CPU() macro will be slower when building with
> --enable-qom-cast-debug.
> 
> Pass CPUX86State* as argument to simulate_rdmsr / simulate_wrmsr
> instead of a CPUState* to avoid an extra cast.
> 
> simulate_rdmsr/simulate_rdmsr(CPUX86State
> 
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
> ---
> RFC: Not even build-tested.
> ---
>  target/i386/hvf/x86_emu.h |  4 ++--
>  target/i386/hvf/hvf.c     |  4 ++--
>  target/i386/hvf/x86_emu.c | 21 ++++++++++-----------
>  3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target/i386/hvf/x86_emu.h b/target/i386/hvf/x86_emu.h
> index 640da90b30..4b846ba80e 100644
> --- a/target/i386/hvf/x86_emu.h
> +++ b/target/i386/hvf/x86_emu.h
> @@ -29,8 +29,8 @@ bool exec_instruction(CPUX86State *env, struct x86_decode *ins);
>  void load_regs(struct CPUState *cpu);
>  void store_regs(struct CPUState *cpu);
>  
> -void simulate_rdmsr(struct CPUState *cpu);
> -void simulate_wrmsr(struct CPUState *cpu);
> +void simulate_rdmsr(CPUX86State *env);
> +void simulate_wrmsr(CPUX86State *env);
>  
>  target_ulong read_reg(CPUX86State *env, int reg, int size);
>  void write_reg(CPUX86State *env, int reg, target_ulong val, int size);
> diff --git a/target/i386/hvf/hvf.c b/target/i386/hvf/hvf.c
> index cb2cd0b02f..20b9ca3ef5 100644
> --- a/target/i386/hvf/hvf.c
> +++ b/target/i386/hvf/hvf.c
> @@ -591,9 +591,9 @@ int hvf_vcpu_exec(CPUState *cpu)
>          {
>              load_regs(cpu);
>              if (exit_reason == EXIT_REASON_RDMSR) {
> -                simulate_rdmsr(cpu);
> +                simulate_rdmsr(env);
>              } else {
> -                simulate_wrmsr(cpu);
> +                simulate_wrmsr(env);
>              }
>              env->eip += ins_len;
>              store_regs(cpu);
> diff --git a/target/i386/hvf/x86_emu.c b/target/i386/hvf/x86_emu.c
> index af1f205ecf..b1f8a685d1 100644
> --- a/target/i386/hvf/x86_emu.c
> +++ b/target/i386/hvf/x86_emu.c
> @@ -663,11 +663,10 @@ static void exec_lods(CPUX86State *env, struct x86_decode *decode)
>      env->eip += decode->len;
>  }
>  
> -void simulate_rdmsr(struct CPUState *cpu)
> +void simulate_rdmsr(CPUX86State *env)
>  {
> -    X86CPU *x86_cpu = X86_CPU(cpu);
> -    CPUX86State *env = &x86_cpu->env;
> -    CPUState *cs = env_cpu(env);
> +    X86CPU *x86_cpu = env_archcpu(env);
> +    CPUState *cpu = env_cpu(env);

I find these names are confusing since in other i386 file
(target/i386/cpu.c), the "X86CPU" is called "cpu", and the "CPUState" is
called "cs".

Regarding this naming, it may be worthy of cleanup to unify the naming
for i386. ;-)

>      uint32_t msr = ECX(env);
>      uint64_t val = 0;
>  
> @@ -746,8 +745,8 @@ void simulate_rdmsr(struct CPUState *cpu)
>          val = env->mtrr_deftype;
>          break;
>      case MSR_CORE_THREAD_COUNT:
> -        val = cs->nr_threads * cs->nr_cores; /* thread count, bits 15..0 */
> -        val |= ((uint32_t)cs->nr_cores << 16); /* core count, bits 31..16 */
> +        val = cpu->nr_threads * cpu->nr_cores;  /* thread count, bits 15..0 */
> +        val |= ((uint32_t)cpu->nr_cores << 16); /* core count, bits 31..16 */
>          break;
>      default:
>          /* fprintf(stderr, "%s: unknown msr 0x%x\n", __func__, msr); */
> @@ -761,14 +760,14 @@ void simulate_rdmsr(struct CPUState *cpu)
>  
>  static void exec_rdmsr(CPUX86State *env, struct x86_decode *decode)
>  {
> -    simulate_rdmsr(env_cpu(env));
> +    simulate_rdmsr(env);
>      env->eip += decode->len;
>  }
>  
> -void simulate_wrmsr(struct CPUState *cpu)
> +void simulate_wrmsr(CPUX86State *env)
>  {
> -    X86CPU *x86_cpu = X86_CPU(cpu);
> -    CPUX86State *env = &x86_cpu->env;
> +    X86CPU *x86_cpu = env_archcpu(env);
> +    CPUState *cpu = env_cpu(env);
>      uint32_t msr = ECX(env);
>      uint64_t data = ((uint64_t)EDX(env) << 32) | EAX(env);
>  
> @@ -856,7 +855,7 @@ void simulate_wrmsr(struct CPUState *cpu)
>  
>  static void exec_wrmsr(CPUX86State *env, struct x86_decode *decode)
>  {
> -    simulate_wrmsr(env_cpu(env));
> +    simulate_wrmsr(env);
>      env->eip += decode->len;
>  }

Reviewed-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>

-Zhao

>  
> -- 
> 2.41.0
> 
> 
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-10-20  9:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-09 11:02 [PATCH 0/6] target: Use env_archcpu() instead of ARCH_CPU(env_cpu(env)) Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-10-09 11:02 ` [PATCH 1/6] target/ppc: Use env_archcpu() in helper_book3s_msgsndp() Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-10-09 11:45   ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2023-10-11  1:20   ` Alistair Francis
2023-10-09 11:02 ` [PATCH 2/6] target/riscv: Use env_archcpu() in [check_]nanbox() Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-10-09 11:45   ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2023-10-09 12:42   ` LIU Zhiwei
2023-10-10 17:04     ` Richard Henderson
2023-10-11  3:25       ` LIU Zhiwei
2023-10-11  5:31         ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-10-12  5:59           ` LIU Zhiwei
2023-10-12 16:06             ` Richard Henderson
2023-10-13  8:48               ` LIU Zhiwei
2023-10-09 12:53   ` Richard W.M. Jones
2023-10-11  1:11   ` Alistair Francis
2023-10-09 11:02 ` [PATCH 3/6] target/s390x: Use env_archcpu() in handle_diag_308() Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-10-11  1:17   ` Alistair Francis
2023-10-09 11:02 ` [PATCH 4/6] target/xtensa: Use env_archcpu() in update_c[compare|count]() Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-10-11  1:17   ` Alistair Francis
2023-10-09 11:02 ` [PATCH 5/6] target/i386/hvf: Use x86_cpu in simulate_[rdmsr|wrmsr]() Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-10-09 22:11   ` Roman Bolshakov
2023-10-20  8:44   ` Zhao Liu
2023-10-09 11:02 ` [PATCH 6/6] target/i386: Use env_archcpu() in simulate_[rdmsr/wrmsr]() Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-10-09 22:41   ` Roman Bolshakov
2023-10-20  9:14   ` Zhao Liu [this message]
2023-10-10 17:06 ` [PATCH 0/6] target: Use env_archcpu() instead of ARCH_CPU(env_cpu(env)) Richard Henderson
2023-10-20 11:12 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZTJE8kPBnCn3luEE@intel.com \
    --to=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=alistair.francis@wdc.com \
    --cc=bin.meng@windriver.com \
    --cc=clg@kaod.org \
    --cc=danielhb413@gmail.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dbarboza@ventanamicro.com \
    --cc=dirty@apple.com \
    --cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jcmvbkbc@gmail.com \
    --cc=liweiwei@iscas.ac.cn \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=philmd@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-riscv@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rbolshakov@ddn.com \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).