From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F4C0C4167B for ; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 16:47:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1r8Ni5-0007or-Ns; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 11:46:49 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1r8Ni2-0007o6-Gf for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 11:46:47 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1r8Nhv-0006G4-Vy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 11:46:45 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1701276396; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=RIK1dZWv1bgRC8SXzNB5TeTahJJwxwApvAx8L+AQ7yk=; b=iU5UU8VKtkA/Me2z3cE3t6c4vRSdBSm6lnXy1exDLMz3iXll2rxhe7oSRI1wby4+mSmKUa MYlLIp8VPLCcJT07p3mzBipnZ6nOad7okFe+w8H8E4CB9ltYXiPPj3Kw48m50pTZslVuln BCAQzQu85cMG/K+Ktf6fq/EfxhwNMPY= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx-ext.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-623-wugL8tgBMbaKYj11RAHAYQ-1; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 11:46:33 -0500 X-MC-Unique: wugL8tgBMbaKYj11RAHAYQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.9]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A13AE1C05AB1; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 16:46:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (unknown [10.42.28.40]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AF90492BE7; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 16:46:31 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 16:46:29 +0000 From: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= To: Stefan Hajnoczi Cc: Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , =?utf-8?Q?C=C3=A9dric?= Le Goater , Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= , Peter Maydell , QEMU Developers Subject: Re: QEMU Summit Minutes 2023 Message-ID: References: <87edgjf2v4.fsf@draig.linaro.org> <68337349-a8c7-4520-a381-a359bf8f8438@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/2.2.10 (2023-03-25) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.9 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.129.124; envelope-from=berrange@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 10:53:00AM -0500, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > To give a picture of the state of the CI, I'd say it fails 80% of the > time. Usually 2 or 3 of the tests fail randomly from a group of <10 > tests that commonly fail randomly. > > In order for the CI to be usable to submaintainers I think it should > _pass_ at least 90% of the time. > > There is still some way to go but I think this goal is achievable in > the next 2 or 3 months because the set of problematic tests is not > that large. FWIW, also bear in mind that when a pipeline fails, it is advisible to *NOT* re-run the pipeline, as that increases your odds of hitting another non-deterministic bug. Instead re-run only the individual job(s) that failed. None the less, we should of course identify and fix non-deterministic test failures. With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|