From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com>
To: "Eduardo Habkost" <eduardo@habkost.net>,
"Marcel Apfelbaum" <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
"Yanan Wang" <wangyanan55@huawei.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Xiaoling Song <xiaoling.song@intel.com>,
Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c: Add more CPU topology test cases
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 17:38:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZbdyEDhz/pjuZNVE@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240118144857.2124034-1-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com>
Hi Philippe,
A kindly ping.
Thanks,
Zhao
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 10:48:49PM +0800, Zhao Liu wrote:
> Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 22:48:49 +0800
> From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH 0/8] tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c: Add more CPU topology
> test cases
> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1
>
> From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
>
> Hi list,
>
> Currently, test-smp-parse lacks the following cases:
> * The case to cover drawer and book parameters parsing in -smp.
> * The case to cover the full topology (with total 7 levels) to ensure
> that the topology-related calculations are correct.
> * The case to check smp_props.has_clusters of MachineClass.
>
> Thus, add the above cases to improve test coverage.
>
> In addition, people is trying to bump max_cpus to 4096 for PC machine
> [1]. Without considering other changes, it's only a matter of time
> before the maximum CPUs is raised. Therefore, aslo bump max_cpus to 4096
> in -smp related test cases as a start.
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20231208122611.32311-1-anisinha@redhat.com/
>
> Regards,
> Zhao
>
> ---
> Zhao Liu (8):
> tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c: Use CPU number macros in invalid topology
> case
> tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c: Bump max_cpus to 4096
> tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c: Make test cases aware of the book/drawer
> tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c: Test "books" parameter in -smp
> tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c: Test "drawers" parameter in -smp
> tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c: Test "drawers" and "books" combination
> case
> tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c: Test the full 7-levels topology hierarchy
> tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c: Test smp_props.has_clusters
>
> tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c | 515 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 494 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-29 9:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-18 14:48 [PATCH 0/8] tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c: Add more CPU topology test cases Zhao Liu
2024-01-18 14:48 ` [PATCH 1/8] tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c: Use CPU number macros in invalid topology case Zhao Liu
2024-03-01 7:37 ` Thomas Huth
2024-01-18 14:48 ` [PATCH 2/8] tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c: Bump max_cpus to 4096 Zhao Liu
2024-03-01 7:40 ` Thomas Huth
2024-03-01 7:59 ` Zhao Liu
2024-01-18 14:48 ` [PATCH 3/8] tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c: Make test cases aware of the book/drawer Zhao Liu
2024-03-01 7:49 ` Thomas Huth
2024-01-18 14:48 ` [PATCH 4/8] tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c: Test "books" parameter in -smp Zhao Liu
2024-03-01 7:52 ` Thomas Huth
2024-01-18 14:48 ` [PATCH 5/8] tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c: Test "drawers" " Zhao Liu
2024-03-01 7:56 ` Thomas Huth
2024-01-18 14:48 ` [PATCH 6/8] tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c: Test "drawers" and "books" combination case Zhao Liu
2024-01-18 14:48 ` [PATCH 7/8] tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c: Test the full 7-levels topology hierarchy Zhao Liu
2024-03-01 7:59 ` Thomas Huth
2024-01-18 14:48 ` [PATCH 8/8] tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c: Test smp_props.has_clusters Zhao Liu
2024-03-01 8:01 ` Thomas Huth
2024-01-29 2:37 ` [PATCH 0/8] tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c: Add more CPU topology test cases Song, Xiaoling
2024-01-29 9:38 ` Zhao Liu [this message]
2024-02-21 6:47 ` Zhao Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZbdyEDhz/pjuZNVE@intel.com \
--to=zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
--cc=xiaoling.song@intel.com \
--cc=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).