Re: [PATCH v1] scripts/checkpatch.pl: check for placeholders in cover letter patches

["Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>]

On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 10:51:58AM +0200, Manos Pitsidianakis wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 at 10:12, Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 09:56:15AM +0200, Manos Pitsidianakis wrote:
> > > Check if a file argument is a cover letter patch produced by
> > > git-format-patch --cover-letter; It is initialized with subject suffix "
> > > *** SUBJECT HERE ***" and body prefix " *** BLURB HERE ***". If they
> > > exist, warn the user.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Manos Pitsidianakis <manos.pitsidianakis@linaro.org>
> > > ---
> > >  scripts/checkpatch.pl | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> > > index 7026895074..34f12c9848 100755
> > > --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> > > +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> > > @@ -1650,6 +1650,20 @@ sub process {
> > >                       $non_utf8_charset = 1;
> > >               }
> > >
> > > +# Check if this is a cover letter patch produced by git-format-patch
> > > +# --cover-letter; It is initialized with subject suffix
> > > +# " *** SUBJECT HERE ***" and body prefix " *** BLURB HERE ***"
> > > +             if ($in_header_lines &&
> > > +                 $rawline =~ /^Subject:.+[*]{3} SUBJECT HERE [*]{3}\s*$/) {
> > > +        WARN("Patch appears to be a cover letter with uninitialized subject" .
> > > +             " '*** SUBJECT HERE ***'\n$hereline\n");
> > > +             }
> > > +
> > > +             if ($rawline =~ /^[*]{3} BLURB HERE [*]{3}\s*$/) {
> > > +        WARN("Patch appears to be a cover letter with leftover placeholder " .
> > > +             "text '*** BLURB HERE ***'\n$hereline\n");
> > > +             }
> >
> > Indentation here is totally off
> 
> It only seems that way because the pre-existing lines use tabs, while
> I used spaces, according to the QEMU Coding style:

It is more important to be consistent within a single function.

Regardless of that though, the indent is still broken because the body
of the 'if' condition is indented /less/ than the 'if' condition itself.


With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|