From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: "Cédric Le Goater" <clg@redhat.com>,
"Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] migration: Fix return-path thread exit
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2024 17:53:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zby7o1O5Ox2NNbbP@x1n> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240201184853.890471-1-clg@redhat.com>
On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 07:48:51PM +0100, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> Hello,
Hi, Cédric,
Thanks for the patches.
>
> Today, close_return_path_on_source() can perform a shutdown to exit
> the return-path thread if an error occured. However, migrate_fd_cleanup()
> does cleanups too early and the shutdown in close_return_path_on_source()
> fails, leaving the source and destination waiting for an event to occur.
>
> This little series tries to fix that. Comments welcome !
One thing I do agree is that relying on qemu_file_get_error(to_dst_file) in
close_return_path_on_source() is weird: IMHO we have better way to detect
"whether the migration has error" now, which is migrate_has_error().
For this specific issue, I think one long standing issue that might be
relevant is we have two QEMUFile (from_dst_file, to_dst_file) that share
the same QIOChannel now. Logically the two QEMUFile should be able to be
managed separately, say, close() of to_dst_file shouldn't affect the other.
However I don't think it's the case now, as qemu_fclose(to_dst_file) will
do qio_channel_close() already, which means there will be a side effect to
the other QEMUFile that its backing IOC is already closed.
Is this the issue we're facing? IOW, the close() of to_dst_file will not
properly kick the other thread who is blocked at reading from_dst_file,
while the shutdown() will kick it out?
If so, not sure whether we can somehow relay the real qio_channel_close()
to until the last user releases it? IOW, conditionally close() the channel
in qio_channel_finalize(), if the channel is still open? Would that make
sense?
Copy Dan too.
Thanks,
--
Peter Xu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-02 9:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-01 18:48 [PATCH 0/2] migration: Fix return-path thread exit Cédric Le Goater
2024-02-01 18:48 ` [PATCH 1/2] migration: Add a file_error argument to close_return_path_on_source() Cédric Le Goater
2024-02-02 14:30 ` Fabiano Rosas
2024-02-02 14:45 ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-02-01 18:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] migration: Fix return-path thread exit Cédric Le Goater
2024-02-02 14:42 ` Fabiano Rosas
2024-02-02 14:51 ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-02-02 15:11 ` Fabiano Rosas
2024-02-05 3:37 ` Peter Xu
2024-02-05 10:17 ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-02-02 9:53 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2024-02-02 13:04 ` [PATCH 0/2] " Cédric Le Goater
2024-02-05 10:32 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-02-06 2:42 ` Peter Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zby7o1O5Ox2NNbbP@x1n \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=clg@redhat.com \
--cc=farosas@suse.de \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).