From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Avihai Horon <avihaih@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] migration/multifd: Move multifd_save_setup into migration thread
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 13:52:54 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZcB3tpl-SApJ5738@x1n> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240202191128.1901-5-farosas@suse.de>
On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 04:11:27PM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> We currently have an unfavorable situation around multifd channels
> creation and the migration thread execution.
>
> We create the multifd channels with qio_channel_socket_connect_async
> -> qio_task_run_in_thread, but only connect them at the
> multifd_new_send_channel_async callback, called from
> qio_task_complete, which is registered as a glib event.
>
> So at multifd_save_setup() we create the channels, but they will only
> be actually usable after the whole multifd_save_setup() calling stack
> returns back to the main loop. Which means that the migration thread
> is already up and running without any possibility for the multifd
> channels to be ready on time.
>
> We currently rely on the channels-ready semaphore blocking
> multifd_send_sync_main() until channels start to come up and release
> it. However there have been bugs recently found when a channel's
> creation fails and multifd_save_cleanup() is allowed to run while
> other channels are still being created.
>
> Let's start to organize this situation by moving the
> multifd_save_setup() call into the migration thread. That way we
> unblock the main-loop to dispatch the completion callbacks and
> actually have a chance of getting the multifd channels ready for when
> the migration thread needs them.
>
> The next patches will deal with the synchronization aspects.
>
> Note that this takes multifd_save_setup() out of the BQL.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
--
Peter Xu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-05 5:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-02 19:11 [PATCH 0/5] migration/multifd: Fix channel creation vs. cleanup races Fabiano Rosas
2024-02-02 19:11 ` [PATCH 1/5] migration/multifd: Join the TLS thread Fabiano Rosas
2024-02-05 5:32 ` Peter Xu
2024-02-02 19:11 ` [PATCH 2/5] migration/multifd: Remove p->running Fabiano Rosas
2024-02-05 5:34 ` Peter Xu
2024-02-02 19:11 ` [PATCH 3/5] migration/multifd: Move multifd_save_setup error handling in to the function Fabiano Rosas
2024-02-05 5:52 ` Peter Xu
2024-02-02 19:11 ` [PATCH 4/5] migration/multifd: Move multifd_save_setup into migration thread Fabiano Rosas
2024-02-05 5:52 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2024-02-02 19:11 ` [PATCH 5/5] migration/multifd: Add a synchronization point for channel creation Fabiano Rosas
2024-02-05 6:20 ` Peter Xu
2024-02-05 11:10 ` Avihai Horon
2024-02-05 12:53 ` Peter Xu
2024-02-05 15:41 ` Fabiano Rosas
2024-02-05 6:32 ` [PATCH 0/5] migration/multifd: Fix channel creation vs. cleanup races Peter Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZcB3tpl-SApJ5738@x1n \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=avihaih@nvidia.com \
--cc=farosas@suse.de \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).