From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Avihai Horon <avihaih@nvidia.com>,
qemu-stable <qemu-stable@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] migration/multifd: Join the TLS thread
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 10:06:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZcIEkUre5AE7C9DN@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZcH4m3hLkYQxwt1S@x1n>
On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 05:15:07PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 08:53:45AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > AFAICS, it is not ovewriting 'p->thread' because at the time when the
> > TLS thread is created, the main 'send thread' has not yet been
> > created. The TLS thread and send thread execution times are mutually
> > exclusive.
>
> IIUC it'll be overwritten after the tls handshake, where in the tls thread
> uses multifd_channel_connect() to create the ultimate multifd thread with
> the same p->thread variable:
>
> qemu_thread_create(&p->thread, p->name, multifd_send_thread, p,
> QEMU_THREAD_JOINABLE);
>
> There it'll overwrite the old value setup by p->thread, hence the tls
> thread resource should be leaked until QEMU quits when created with
> JOINABLE in both contexts.
Ah yes, missed that, you're right.
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-06 10:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-05 19:49 [PATCH v2 0/6] migration/multifd: Fix channel creation vs. cleanup races Fabiano Rosas
2024-02-05 19:49 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] migration/multifd: Join the TLS thread Fabiano Rosas
2024-02-06 8:53 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-02-06 9:15 ` Peter Xu
2024-02-06 10:06 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2024-02-05 19:49 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] migration/multifd: Remove p->running Fabiano Rosas
2024-02-05 19:49 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] migration/multifd: Move multifd_send_setup error handling in to the function Fabiano Rosas
2024-02-05 19:49 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] migration/multifd: Move multifd_send_setup into migration thread Fabiano Rosas
2024-02-05 19:49 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] migration/multifd: Unify multifd and TLS connection paths Fabiano Rosas
2024-02-06 3:33 ` Peter Xu
2024-02-06 12:44 ` Avihai Horon
2024-02-06 14:30 ` Fabiano Rosas
2024-02-06 14:44 ` Avihai Horon
2024-02-05 19:49 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] migration/multifd: Add a synchronization point for channel creation Fabiano Rosas
2024-02-06 3:37 ` Peter Xu
2024-02-06 3:42 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] migration/multifd: Fix channel creation vs. cleanup races Peter Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZcIEkUre5AE7C9DN@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=avihaih@nvidia.com \
--cc=farosas@suse.de \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-stable@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).