From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Bryan Zhang <bryan.zhang@bytedance.com>,
Hao Xiang <hao.xiang@bytedance.com>,
Yuan Liu <yuan1.liu@intel.com>
Cc: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>,
QEMU Devel Mailing List <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Regarding to the recent Intel IAA/DSA/QAT support on migration
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 16:10:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZcM68L8PaoD6qtLp@x1n> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZcM6TIWkyCRsk6wn@x1n>
Copy qemu-devel.
On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 04:07:40PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm sending this email just to leave a generic comment to the recent
> migration efforts to enable these new Intel technologies.
>
> The relevant patchsets (latest version so far) we're discussing are:
>
> [PATCH v3 0/4] Live Migration Acceleration with IAA Compression
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240103112851.908082-1-yuan1.liu@intel.com
>
> [PATCH v3 00/20] Use Intel DSA accelerator to offload zero page checking in multifd live migration.
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240104004452.324068-1-hao.xiang@bytedance.com
>
> [PATCH 0/5] *** Implement using Intel QAT to offload ZLIB
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231231205804.2366509-1-bryan.zhang@bytedance.com
>
> I want to comment in a generic way since this should apply to all these
> series:
>
> - A heads-up that multifd code is rapidly changing recently, I apologize
> that you'll need a rebase. It's just that it's probably much better to
> do this before anything lands there.
>
> IIUC the good thing is we found that send_prepare() doesn't need to be
> changed that much, however there's still some change; please refer to
> the new code (I'll prepare a pull tomorrow to include most of the
> changes, and we should have a major thread race fixed too with Fabiano
> & Avihai's help). I hope this will also provide some kind of isolation
> to e.g. other works that may touch other areas. E.g., I hope fixed-ram
> won't need to conflict much with any of the above series now.
>
> - When posting the new patchset (if there is a plan..), please make sure
> we have:
>
> - Proper unit tests for the new code (probably mostly software
> fallbacks to be tested on the new libraries being introduced; just to
> make sure the new library code paths can get some torture please).
>
> - Proper documentation for the new code. Please feel free to start
> creating your own .rst file under docs/devel/migration/, we can try
> to merge them later. It should help avoid conflictions. Please also
> link the new file into index.rst there.
>
> IMHO the document can contain many things, the important ones could
> start from: who should enable such feature; what one can get from
> having it enabled; what is the HW requirement to enable it; how
> should one tune the new parameters, and so on... some links to the
> technology behinds it would be nice too to be referenced.
>
> - Try to add new code (especially HW/library based) into new file.
> I see that QPL & QAT already proposed its own files (multifd-pql.c,
> multifd-qatzip.c) which is great.
>
> Xiang, please also consider doing so for the DSA based zero page
> detection. It can be called multifd-zero-page.c, for example, and
> you can create it when working on the
> offload-zero-page-detect-to-multifd patchset already.
>
> - Please provide someone who can potentially maintain this code if ever
> possible. Pushing these code upstream is great, but maintaining will
> also take effort. It might be impractical this keeps growing for
> migration maintainers (currently Fabiano and myself), so we may like
> to have people covering these areas, especially when the new codes
> are not directly relevant to migration framework.
>
> I'd suggest for each of the project we can add an entry in
> MAINTAINERS below "Migration" section, adding relevant files (and
> these files should exist in both the new section and "Migration"). I
> am not sure whether Bytedance would be able to cover this, or we
> should try to find someone from Intel? If you're willing to add
> yourself to maintain such codes, please attach the maintainers file
> change together with the series. It will be very much appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Peter Xu
--
Peter Xu
next parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-07 8:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <ZcM6TIWkyCRsk6wn@x1n>
2024-02-07 8:10 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2024-02-07 8:38 ` Regarding to the recent Intel IAA/DSA/QAT support on migration Liu, Yuan1
2024-02-08 1:02 ` [External] " Hao Xiang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZcM68L8PaoD6qtLp@x1n \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=bryan.zhang@bytedance.com \
--cc=farosas@suse.de \
--cc=hao.xiang@bytedance.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=yuan1.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).