From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Avihai Horon" <avihaih@nvidia.com>,
"Daniel P . Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] migration/multifd: Drop registered_yank
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 11:20:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZdVr8qTb7MKFgnHO@x1n> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871q9nceam.fsf@suse.de>
On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 09:48:33AM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> peterx@redhat.com writes:
>
> > From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> >
> > With a clear definition of p->c protocol, where we only set it up if the
> > channel is fully established (TLS or non-TLS), registered_yank boolean will
> > have equal meaning of "p->c != NULL".
> >
> > Drop registered_yank by checking p->c instead.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@suse.de>
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > migration/multifd.h | 2 --
> > migration/multifd.c | 7 +++----
> > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/migration/multifd.h b/migration/multifd.h
> > index 8a1cad0996..b3fe27ae93 100644
> > --- a/migration/multifd.h
> > +++ b/migration/multifd.h
> > @@ -78,8 +78,6 @@ typedef struct {
> > bool tls_thread_created;
> > /* communication channel */
> > QIOChannel *c;
> > - /* is the yank function registered */
> > - bool registered_yank;
> > /* packet allocated len */
> > uint32_t packet_len;
> > /* guest page size */
> > diff --git a/migration/multifd.c b/migration/multifd.c
> > index 4a85a6b7b3..278453cf84 100644
> > --- a/migration/multifd.c
> > +++ b/migration/multifd.c
> > @@ -648,11 +648,11 @@ static int multifd_send_channel_destroy(QIOChannel *send)
> >
> > static bool multifd_send_cleanup_channel(MultiFDSendParams *p, Error **errp)
> > {
> > - if (p->registered_yank) {
> > + if (p->c) {
> > migration_ioc_unregister_yank(p->c);
> > + multifd_send_channel_destroy(p->c);
>
> At socket_send_channel_destroy the clean up of outgoing_args.saddr will
> now be skipped. The failure at multifd_new_send_channel_async might have
> been due to TLS, in which case all of plain socket setup will have
> happened properly.
Right, IMHO it's a hack to free globals in a per-channel helper. We should
have moved:
if (outgoing_args.saddr) {
qapi_free_SocketAddress(outgoing_args.saddr);
outgoing_args.saddr = NULL;
}
Outside irrelevant of that..
That could be done later I guess, because we have one more guard:
socket_start_outgoing_migration():
/* in case previous migration leaked it */
qapi_free_SocketAddress(outgoing_args.saddr);
outgoing_args.saddr = addr;
If you think proper, I can add one more patch to do that cleanup, IOW, move
above free() into multifd_send_cleanup_state().
Thanks,
--
Peter Xu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-21 3:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-08 3:51 [PATCH 0/2] migration: cleanup TLS channel referencing peterx
2024-02-08 3:51 ` [PATCH 1/2] migration/multifd: Cleanup TLS iochannel referencing peterx
2024-02-08 12:44 ` Fabiano Rosas
2024-02-08 14:10 ` Avihai Horon
2024-02-21 3:21 ` Peter Xu
2024-02-08 3:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] migration/multifd: Drop registered_yank peterx
2024-02-08 12:48 ` Fabiano Rosas
2024-02-21 3:20 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2024-02-21 12:58 ` Fabiano Rosas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZdVr8qTb7MKFgnHO@x1n \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=avihaih@nvidia.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=farosas@suse.de \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).