From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com>
To: JeeHeng Sia <jeeheng.sia@starfivetech.com>
Cc: "Daniel P . Berrang�" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Eduardo Habkost" <eduardo@habkost.net>,
"Marcel Apfelbaum" <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daud�" <philmd@linaro.org>,
"Yanan Wang" <wangyanan55@huawei.com>,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
"Eric Blake" <eblake@redhat.com>,
"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
"Marcelo Tosatti" <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
"Alex Benn�e" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
"Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"Jonathan Cameron" <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"qemu-riscv@nongnu.org" <qemu-riscv@nongnu.org>,
"qemu-arm@nongnu.org" <qemu-arm@nongnu.org>,
"Zhenyu Wang" <zhenyu.z.wang@intel.com>,
"Dapeng Mi" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>,
"Yongwei Ma" <yongwei.ma@intel.com>,
"Zhao Liu" <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/8] hw/core: Move CPU topology enumeration into arch-agnostic file
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 12:46:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZeAMP7OCwWPMhpeD@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BJSPR01MB05614B900DA2E93AE9F8E0BE9C58A@BJSPR01MB0561.CHNPR01.prod.partner.outlook.cn>
Hi JeeHeng,
> > +const char *cpu_topo_to_string(CPUTopoLevel topo)
> > +{
> > + return cpu_topo_descriptors[topo].name;
> > +}
> > +
> > +CPUTopoLevel string_to_cpu_topo(char *str)
>
> Can use const char *str.
Okay, I'll.
> > +{
> > + for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(cpu_topo_descriptors); i++) {
> > + CPUTopoInfo *info = &cpu_topo_descriptors[i];
> > +
> > + if (!strcmp(info->name, str)) {
>
> Suggest to use strncmp instead.
Thanks! I tries "l1i-cache=coree", and it causes Segmentation fault.
Will fix.
> > + return (CPUTopoLevel)i;
> > + }
> > + }
> > + return CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_MAX;
> > +}
> > @@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ static uint32_t num_threads_by_topo_level(X86CPUTopoInfo *topo_info,
> > enum CPUTopoLevel topo_level)
> > {
> > switch (topo_level) {
> > - case CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_SMT:
> > + case CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_THREAD:
> > return 1;
> Just wondering why 'return 1' is used directly for the thread, but not
> for the rest?
This helper returens how many threads in one topology domain/container
at this level.
For thread level, it calculates how many threads are in one thread
domain, so it returns 1 directly.
Thanks,
Zhao
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-29 4:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-20 9:24 [RFC 0/8] Introduce SMP Cache Topology Zhao Liu
2024-02-20 9:24 ` [RFC 1/8] hw/core: Rename CpuTopology to CPUTopology Zhao Liu
2024-02-20 9:24 ` [RFC 2/8] hw/core: Move CPU topology enumeration into arch-agnostic file Zhao Liu
2024-02-28 9:53 ` JeeHeng Sia
2024-02-29 4:46 ` Zhao Liu [this message]
2024-02-20 9:24 ` [RFC 3/8] hw/core: Define cache topology for machine Zhao Liu
2024-02-20 9:25 ` [RFC 4/8] hw/core: Add cache topology options in -smp Zhao Liu
2024-02-21 12:46 ` Markus Armbruster
2024-02-21 15:17 ` Zhao Liu
2024-02-26 15:39 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2024-02-27 9:20 ` Zhao Liu
2024-02-27 9:12 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-02-27 10:35 ` Zhao Liu
2024-02-27 10:51 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2024-02-27 15:55 ` Zhao Liu
2024-02-28 5:38 ` JeeHeng Sia
2024-02-29 7:04 ` Zhao Liu
2024-02-20 9:25 ` [RFC 5/8] i386/cpu: Support thread and module level cache topology Zhao Liu
2024-02-20 9:25 ` [RFC 6/8] i386/cpu: Update cache topology with machine's configuration Zhao Liu
2024-02-28 9:45 ` JeeHeng Sia
2024-02-29 7:19 ` Zhao Liu
2024-02-20 9:25 ` [RFC 7/8] i386/pc: Support cache topology in -smp for PC machine Zhao Liu
2024-02-20 9:25 ` [RFC 8/8] qemu-options: Add the cache topology description of -smp Zhao Liu
2024-02-26 15:47 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2024-02-27 16:17 ` Zhao Liu
2024-02-20 20:07 ` [RFC 0/8] Introduce SMP Cache Topology Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZeAMP7OCwWPMhpeD@intel.com \
--to=zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
--cc=jeeheng.sia@starfivetech.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-riscv@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
--cc=yongwei.ma@intel.com \
--cc=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
--cc=zhenyu.z.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).