From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94BFDC5475B for ; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 07:46:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rfxai-0000VP-St; Fri, 01 Mar 2024 02:46:01 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rfxae-0000V2-9V for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 01 Mar 2024 02:45:57 -0500 Received: from mgamail.intel.com ([198.175.65.10]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rfxab-0002kg-RB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 01 Mar 2024 02:45:55 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1709279154; x=1740815154; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=kVLJsx5v5qXn0TuWGotsuRJXrXBZ9M7Uy1kfXfj3gDY=; b=UnLiMF+pILmbeWiw0dyG870dlKI8/Zjd+HhBE0Z+/DK5sTYBNfwJSsQ1 6LoAFOxMNlYRn/YQmBS0kIJZrtzLTHFX9PYh0IU5emku9V2XZ2STJZDam W1y84ghUuL8f4ReK9z1AFEtPcElPBcQMsA1fQ3YbKft0Y9Ocl7CNvuhib eTVs/9Lm/oagTtT6RWVhVeNrTNdKIptODuWW2ZdFjcMcZDMAfeQAtZ0an EsfsJiqjjw9bMN4+GnTHm5SeNQVDYAuFyt2niwPoIY8D+tWoq/1vTxTtV 2xs6I2dBo3jhnbzKljJIYi7tvY/zEXOPrakvKeZcJHB/Xn5J/0k46V3Mu A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10999"; a="21260266" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,195,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="21260266" Received: from fmviesa002.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.142]) by orvoesa102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Feb 2024 23:45:51 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,195,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="31294847" Received: from liuzhao-optiplex-7080.sh.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.239.160.36]) by fmviesa002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 29 Feb 2024 23:45:49 -0800 Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2024 15:59:33 +0800 From: Zhao Liu To: Thomas Huth Cc: Eduardo Habkost , Marcel Apfelbaum , Philippe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Mathieu-Daud=E9?= , Yanan Wang , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Xiaoling Song , Zhao Liu , Ani Sinha , Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c: Bump max_cpus to 4096 Message-ID: References: <20240118144857.2124034-1-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com> <20240118144857.2124034-3-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com> <50b48e30-9187-4909-94f4-ca982f1d70ed@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50b48e30-9187-4909-94f4-ca982f1d70ed@redhat.com> Received-SPF: none client-ip=198.175.65.10; envelope-from=zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com; helo=mgamail.intel.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.096, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Hi Thomas, On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 08:40:54AM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote: > Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2024 08:40:54 +0100 > From: Thomas Huth > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c: Bump max_cpus to 4096 > > On 18/01/2024 15.48, Zhao Liu wrote: > > From: Zhao Liu > > > > PC mahine is trying to support up to 4096 vCPUs [1], so it's necessary > > s/mahine/machine/ > > > to bump max_cpus in test-smp-parse to 4096 to cover the topological > > needs of future machines. > > > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20231208122611.32311-1-anisinha@redhat.com/ > > Is it ok for this test patch here to get included without that patch > already, or shall this wait for the patch from Ani first? > This patch doesn't rely on Ani's, but given my typo and outdated links (Ani already has v5), I can respin the series soon! Thanks, Zhao