qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Chun Feng Wu <wucf@cn.ibm.com>
Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: Does "-object" support structured options now?
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 08:06:25 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZeWA8VrzgjKjETXh@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <PH7PR15MB6503236A69BD173E62FC6791F7232@PH7PR15MB6503.namprd15.prod.outlook.com>

On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 06:43:19AM +0000, Chun Feng Wu wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I noticed that throttle-group can be created with “-object”, however, per qemu doc(https://github.com/qemu/qemu/blob/master/docs/throttle.txt), “-object” doesn’t support structured options at that moment:
> 
> “
> A throttle-group can also be created with the -object command line
> option but at the moment there is no way to pass a 'limits' parameter
> that contains a ThrottleLimits structure. The solution is to set the
> individual values directly, like in this example:
> 
>    -object throttle-group,id=group0,x-iops-total=1000,x-bps-write=2097152
> 
> Note however that this is not a stable API (hence the 'x-' prefixes) and
> will disappear when -object gains support for structured options and
> enables use of 'limits'.
> “
> 
> Does anybody know if the latest qemu code still lacks of such
> support(structured options for -object)? If so, is there any
> plan to support it(instead of non-stable API)?

-object supports JSON syntax these days so any QAPI structure can be
expressed no matter how complex.


With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|



  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-04  8:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-04  6:43 Does "-object" support structured options now? Chun Feng Wu
2024-03-04  8:06 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2024-03-06 14:33   ` Chun Feng Wu
2024-03-06 14:36     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-03-06 14:42       ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-03-06 23:45         ` Chun Feng Wu
2024-03-06 14:40     ` Markus Armbruster

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZeWA8VrzgjKjETXh@redhat.com \
    --to=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=wucf@cn.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).