qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: "Eduardo Habkost" <eduardo@habkost.net>,
	"Marcel Apfelbaum" <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
	"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
	"Yanan Wang" <wangyanan55@huawei.com>,
	"Daniel P . Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
	"Igor Mammedov" <imammedo@redhat.com>,
	"Prasad Pandit" <ppandit@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Xiaoling Song" <xiaoling.song@intel.com>,
	"Zhao Liu" <zhao1.liu@intel.com>,
	devel@lists.libvirt.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/14] hw/core/machine-smp: Deprecate unsupported "parameter=1" SMP configurations
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 15:07:13 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZelnodvaPVAfaxUM@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5aafc78f-8c2e-429c-9599-4d2e1bb184e9@redhat.com>

On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 07:22:10AM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 07:22:10 +0100
> From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/14] hw/core/machine-smp: Deprecate unsupported
>  "parameter=1" SMP configurations
> 
> On 06/03/2024 10.53, Zhao Liu wrote:
> > From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
> > 
> > Currentlt, it was allowed for users to specify the unsupported
> 
> s/Currentlt/Currently/
> 
> > topology parameter as "1". For example, x86 PC machine doesn't
> > support drawer/book/cluster topology levels, but user could specify
> > "-smp drawers=1,books=1,clusters=1".
> > 
> > This is meaningless and confusing, so that the support for this kind of
> > configurations is marked depresated since 9.0. And report warning
> 
> s/depresated/deprecated/
> 
> > message for such case like:
> > 
> > qemu-system-x86_64: warning: Deprecated CPU topology (considered invalid):
> >                      Unsupported clusters parameter mustn't be specified as 1
> > qemu-system-x86_64: warning: Deprecated CPU topology (considered invalid):
> >                      Unsupported books parameter mustn't be specified as 1
> > qemu-system-x86_64: warning: Deprecated CPU topology (considered invalid):
> >                      Unsupported drawers parameter mustn't be specified as 1
> > 
> > Users have to ensure that all the topology members described with -smp
> > are supported by the target machine.
> > 
> > Cc: devel@lists.libvirt.org
> > Signed-off-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
> > ---
> >   docs/about/deprecated.rst | 14 +++++++++
> >   hw/core/machine-smp.c     | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> >   2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/docs/about/deprecated.rst b/docs/about/deprecated.rst
> > index 872974640252..2e782e83e952 100644
> > --- a/docs/about/deprecated.rst
> > +++ b/docs/about/deprecated.rst
> > @@ -47,6 +47,20 @@ as short-form boolean values, and passed to plugins as ``arg_name=on``.
> >   However, short-form booleans are deprecated and full explicit ``arg_name=on``
> >   form is preferred.
> > +``-smp`` (Unsopported "parameter=1" SMP configurations) (since 9.0)
> 
> s/Unsopported/Unsupported/
> 
> > +'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
> > +
> > +Specified CPU topology parameters must be supported by the machine.
> > +
> > +In the SMP configuration, users should provide the CPU topology parameters that
> > +are supported by the target machine.
> > +
> > +However, historically it was allowed for users to specify the unsupported
> > +topology parameter as "1", which is meaningless. So support for this kind of
> > +configurations (e.g. -smp drawers=1,books=1,clusters=1 for x86 PC machine) is
> > +marked depresated since 9.0, users have to ensure that all the topology members
> 
> s/depresated/deprecated/
> 
> > +described with -smp are supported by the target machine.
> > +
> >   QEMU Machine Protocol (QMP) commands
> >   ------------------------------------
> > diff --git a/hw/core/machine-smp.c b/hw/core/machine-smp.c
> > index 96533886b14e..50a5a40dbc3d 100644
> > --- a/hw/core/machine-smp.c
> > +++ b/hw/core/machine-smp.c
> > @@ -112,30 +112,61 @@ void machine_parse_smp_config(MachineState *ms,
> >       /*
> >        * If not supported by the machine, a topology parameter must be
> > -     * omitted or specified equal to 1.
> > +     * omitted.
> >        */
> > -    if (!mc->smp_props.dies_supported && dies > 1) {
> > -        error_setg(errp, "dies not supported by this machine's CPU topology");
> > -        return;
> > -    }
> > -    if (!mc->smp_props.clusters_supported && clusters > 1) {
> > -        error_setg(errp, "clusters not supported by this machine's CPU topology");
> > -        return;
> > +    if (!mc->smp_props.clusters_supported && config->has_clusters) {
> > +        if (config->clusters > 1) {
> > +            error_setg(errp, "clusters not supported by this "
> > +                       "machine's CPU topology");
> > +            return;
> > +        } else {
> > +            /* Here clusters only equals 1 since we've checked zero case. */
> > +            warn_report("Deprecated CPU topology (considered invalid): "
> > +                        "Unsupported clusters parameter mustn't be "
> > +                        "specified as 1");
> > +        }
> >       }
> > +    clusters = clusters > 0 ? clusters : 1;
> > +    if (!mc->smp_props.dies_supported && config->has_dies) {
> > +        if (config->dies > 1) {
> > +            error_setg(errp, "dies not supported by this "
> > +                       "machine's CPU topology");
> > +            return;
> > +        } else {
> > +            /* Here dies only equals 1 since we've checked zero case. */
> > +            warn_report("Deprecated CPU topology (considered invalid): "
> > +                        "Unsupported dies parameter mustn't be "
> > +                        "specified as 1");
> > +        }
> > +    }
> >       dies = dies > 0 ? dies : 1;
> > -    clusters = clusters > 0 ? clusters : 1;
> > -    if (!mc->smp_props.books_supported && books > 1) {
> > -        error_setg(errp, "books not supported by this machine's CPU topology");
> > -        return;
> > +    if (!mc->smp_props.books_supported && config->has_books) {
> > +        if (config->books > 1) {
> > +            error_setg(errp, "books not supported by this "
> > +                       "machine's CPU topology");
> > +            return;
> > +        } else {
> > +            /* Here books only equals 1 since we've checked zero case. */
> > +            warn_report("Deprecated CPU topology (considered invalid): "
> > +                        "Unsupported books parameter mustn't be "
> > +                        "specified as 1");
> > +        }
> >       }
> >       books = books > 0 ? books : 1;
> > -    if (!mc->smp_props.drawers_supported && drawers > 1) {
> > -        error_setg(errp,
> > -                   "drawers not supported by this machine's CPU topology");
> > -        return;
> > +    if (!mc->smp_props.drawers_supported && config->has_drawers) {
> > +        if (config->drawers > 1) {
> > +            error_setg(errp, "drawers not supported by this "
> > +                       "machine's CPU topology");
> > +            return;
> > +        } else {
> > +            /* Here drawers only equals 1 since we've checked zero case. */
> > +            warn_report("Deprecated CPU topology (considered invalid): "
> > +                        "Unsupported drawers parameter mustn't be "
> > +                        "specified as 1");
> > +        }
> >       }
> >       drawers = drawers > 0 ? drawers : 1;
> 
> Apart from the typos, patch looks fine. I recommend to run "checkpath.pl"
> with the --codespell parameter, that helps to avoid those.
>

Oops...I didn't realize there were so many typos.

Maybe I'm relying too much on --codespell ;-), and these typos aren't in
the default dictionary used by --codespell so I didn't check them
before.

I'll refresh a new version (at Friday) for these typos.

Thanks,
Zhao



  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-07  6:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-06  9:53 [PATCH 00/14] Cleanup on SMP and its test Zhao Liu
2024-03-06  9:53 ` [PATCH 01/14] hw/core/machine-smp: Remove deprecated "parameter=0" SMP configurations Zhao Liu
2024-03-06  9:53 ` [PATCH 02/14] hw/core/machine-smp: Deprecate unsupported "parameter=1" " Zhao Liu
2024-03-07  6:22   ` Thomas Huth
2024-03-07  7:07     ` Zhao Liu [this message]
2024-03-06  9:53 ` [PATCH 03/14] hw/core/machine-smp: Simplify variables' initialization in machine_parse_smp_config() Zhao Liu
2024-03-08 13:20   ` Thomas Huth
2024-03-08 15:33     ` Zhao Liu
2024-03-10 11:55       ` Prasad Pandit
2024-03-11  5:20         ` Zhao Liu
2024-03-13 10:52           ` Prasad Pandit
2024-03-18  8:06             ` Zhao Liu
2024-03-18 11:18               ` Prasad Pandit
2024-03-06  9:53 ` [PATCH 04/14] hw/core/machine-smp: Calculate total CPUs once " Zhao Liu
2024-03-06 20:56   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-03-06  9:53 ` [PATCH 05/14] tests/unit/test-smp-parse: Drop the unsupported "dies=1" case Zhao Liu
2024-03-08 13:22   ` Thomas Huth
2024-03-06  9:53 ` [PATCH 06/14] tests/unit/test-smp-parse: Use CPU number macros in invalid topology case Zhao Liu
2024-03-06  9:54 ` [PATCH 07/14] tests/unit/test-smp-parse: Bump max_cpus to 4096 Zhao Liu
2024-03-07  6:01   ` Thomas Huth
2024-03-07  7:03     ` Zhao Liu
2024-03-06  9:54 ` [PATCH 08/14] tests/unit/test-smp-parse: Make test cases aware of the book/drawer Zhao Liu
2024-03-06  9:54 ` [PATCH 09/14] tests/unit/test-smp-parse: Test "books" parameter in -smp Zhao Liu
2024-03-06  9:54 ` [PATCH 10/14] tests/unit/test-smp-parse: Test "drawers" " Zhao Liu
2024-03-06  9:54 ` [PATCH 11/14] tests/unit/test-smp-parse: Test "drawers" and "books" combination case Zhao Liu
2024-03-07  6:07   ` Thomas Huth
2024-03-06  9:54 ` [PATCH 12/14] tests/unit/test-smp-parse: Test the full 7-levels topology hierarchy Zhao Liu
2024-03-06  9:54 ` [PATCH 13/14] tests/unit/test-smp-parse: Test smp_props.has_clusters Zhao Liu
2024-03-06  9:54 ` [PATCH 14/14] tests/unit/test-smp-parse: Test "parameter=0" SMP configurations Zhao Liu
2024-03-07  6:11   ` Thomas Huth
2024-03-06 21:07 ` [PATCH 00/14] Cleanup on SMP and its test Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-03-07  7:25   ` Zhao Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZelnodvaPVAfaxUM@intel.com \
    --to=zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=devel@lists.libvirt.org \
    --cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
    --cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
    --cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
    --cc=philmd@linaro.org \
    --cc=ppandit@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
    --cc=xiaoling.song@intel.com \
    --cc=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).