From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58C41C48BF6 for ; Thu, 7 Mar 2024 09:50:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1riANr-0001St-Cp; Thu, 07 Mar 2024 04:49:51 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1riANn-0001SZ-Rl for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Mar 2024 04:49:47 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1riANY-0005fU-3F for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Mar 2024 04:49:47 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1709804971; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Hf4Yl1Z60vx3adXFbcF04S2ZKeeZUYQeQHs1dpLD1sU=; b=BxcDvtXlz88dLMBImYqmnMZvvJMfORO6B75q3fEewrMkEJugw1xcfJN3RmgSY4pT9nWHmr hdoofte9bxfyrKz0uxlWEhL4SZa7wgYze32kt9V/miIohqpFe6k/HZm000WBvPAhrDhDry Fb8YVRe4lVb09VDj6KdQIzX7N+KokkM= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-584-qIX3gfGoMzqUBOSmYL8VhA-1; Thu, 07 Mar 2024 04:49:28 -0500 X-MC-Unique: qIX3gfGoMzqUBOSmYL8VhA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45DE2101A552; Thu, 7 Mar 2024 09:49:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (unknown [10.42.28.51]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A35751121306; Thu, 7 Mar 2024 09:49:27 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 09:49:25 +0000 From: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= To: =?utf-8?Q?Marc-Andr=C3=A9?= Lureau Cc: "Kim, Dongwon" , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ui/gtk: introducing vc->visible Message-ID: References: <20240130234840.53122-1-dongwon.kim@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/2.2.12 (2023-09-09) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.3 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=berrange@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org On Tue, Mar 05, 2024 at 04:18:18PM +0400, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > Hi Kim > > I am uncomfortable with the series in general. > > Not only we don't have the means to draw dmabuf/scanout "when > required", so resuming drawing won't work until the guest draws (this > is already a problem but you are only making it worse). And I also > think reconfiguring the guest by merely minimizing or switching > window/tabs isn't what most users would expect. > > Daniel, could you have a look too? I'm similarly pretty uncomfortable with the proposed behaviour as it feels like it would be introducing a whole new set of unfortunate side-effects/problems. With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|