From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F270CC54E5D for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 14:28:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rmaRF-00026k-1u; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 10:27:37 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rmaRD-00026U-61 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 10:27:35 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rmaRB-0006nL-Gh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 10:27:34 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1710858452; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=vx5JV3rM9S8P4Nk3jVl3rTOULTyn6nwpaYlv/B9Q9vc=; b=i//fUewzNzs26ZyqR7Yl6N1p54dnVER1T4R1yAMGExpTs1JvZ+o+IsWUgM3ZBmMohNCQrv 2qx+7fnp1Iafjx+0dds2uue1+dQdj6vArFQlpj9/wZllFhc7YtOcUGxf0so6bCZLByBNuc KZgIXV257fPotfjEPqe4Z24+L9n/raQ= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-444-G4BH8jeNOHOw8nRnN2tsrA-1; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 10:27:28 -0400 X-MC-Unique: G4BH8jeNOHOw8nRnN2tsrA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.10]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F6ED85A58B; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 14:27:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (unknown [10.42.28.88]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC3E6492BD0; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 14:27:27 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 14:27:21 +0000 From: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, xiaoyao.li@intel.com, michael.roth@amd.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] target/i386: Implement mc->kvm_type() to get VM type Message-ID: References: <20240319140000.1014247-1-pbonzini@redhat.com> <20240319140000.1014247-7-pbonzini@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/2.2.12 (2023-09-09) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.10 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=berrange@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -24 X-Spam_score: -2.5 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.422, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 03:25:53PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 3:15 PM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > +int kvm_get_vm_type(MachineState *ms, const char *vm_type) > > > > The 'vm_type' parameter is never used here. What value is it expected > > to have, and should be diagnosing an error if some unexpected value > > is provided. > > It's the value of the kvm-type machine property, if any; but no x86 > machine defines one, so right now it's always NULL. I left it in > because then it's clearer than this is an implementation of > mc->kvm_type, but I can remove it or pass it down to > x86_confidential_guest_kvm_type(). If we expect it to always be NULL, lets validate that is the case and error_report + exit, if not. With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|