qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
	qemu-trivial@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Remove useless architecture prefix from the CPU list
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 09:03:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZiYZyOqeM2tYPcCs@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240420054606.13353-1-thuth@redhat.com>

On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 07:46:03AM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> Printing an architecture prefix in front of each CPU name is not helpful
> at all: It is confusing for the users since they don't know whether they
> have to specify these letters for the "-cpu" parameter, too, and it also
> takes some precious space in the dense output of the CPU entries. Let's
> simply remove those now.

Could it be said that this arch prefix is about to finally become useful
with Philippe's patches to add a 'qemu-system-any' command covering
multiple arches ?

With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|



  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-04-22  8:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-20  5:46 [PATCH 0/3] Remove useless architecture prefix from the CPU list Thomas Huth
2024-04-20  5:46 ` [PATCH 1/3] target/i386/cpu: Remove "x86" " Thomas Huth
2024-04-20  5:46 ` [PATCH 2/3] target/s390x/cpu_models: Rework the output of "-cpu help" Thomas Huth
2024-04-20  5:46 ` [PATCH 3/3] target/ppc/cpu_init: Remove "PowerPC" prefix from the CPU list Thomas Huth
2024-04-20 14:40 ` [PATCH 0/3] Remove useless architecture " David Hildenbrand
2024-04-20 16:26 ` Richard Henderson
2024-04-20 16:53 ` Michael Tokarev
2024-04-22  8:03 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2024-04-22  8:22   ` Thomas Huth
2024-04-29 10:26     ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-04-26  9:13 ` Mario Casquero

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZiYZyOqeM2tYPcCs@redhat.com \
    --to=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=danielhb413@gmail.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-trivial@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).