From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
devel@lists.libvirt.org, "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
"Laurent Vivier" <laurent@vivier.eu>,
qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org,
"Peter Xu" <peterx@redhat.com>, "Fabiano Rosas" <farosas@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs/about: Automatically deprecate versioned machine types older than 6 years
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 10:55:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZjDAGuONZ_Zem3fL@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240430064529.411699-1-thuth@redhat.com>
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 08:45:29AM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> Old machine types often have bugs or work-arounds that affect our
> possibilities to move forward with the QEMU code base (see for example
> https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/2213 for a bug that likely
> cannot be fixed without breaking live migration with old machine types,
> or https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-12/msg04516.html or
> commit ea985d235b86). So instead of going through the process of manually
> deprecating old machine types again and again, let's rather add an entry
> that can stay, which declares that machine types older than 6 years are
> considered as deprecated automatically. Six years should be sufficient to
> support the release cycles of most Linux distributions.
Reading this again, I think we're mixing two concepts here.
With this 6 year cut off, we're declaring the actual *removal* date,
not the deprecation date.
A deprecation is something that happens prior to removal normally,
to give people a warning of /future/ removal, as a suggestion
that they stop using it.
If we never set the 'deprecation_reason' on a machine type, then
unless someone reads this doc, they'll never realize they are on
a deprecated machine.
When it comes to machine types, I see deprecation as a way to tell
people they should not deploy a /new/ VM on a machine type, only
use it for back compat (incoming migration / restore from saved
image) with existing deployed VMs.
If we delete a machine on the 6 year anniversary, then users
don't want to be deploying /new/ VMs using that on the
5 year anniversary as it only gives a 1 year upgrade window.
So how long far back do we consider it reasonable for a user
to deploy a /new/ VM on an old machine type ? 1 year, 2 years,
3 years ?
How about picking the half way point ? 3 years ?
ie, set deprecation_reason for any machine that is 3 years
old, but declare that our deprecation cycle lasts for
3 years, instead of the normal 1 year, when applied to
machine types.
This would give a strong hint that users should get off the
old machine type, several years before its finally deleted.
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> ---
> docs/about/deprecated.rst | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/docs/about/deprecated.rst b/docs/about/deprecated.rst
> index 6d595de3b6..fe69e2d44c 100644
> --- a/docs/about/deprecated.rst
> +++ b/docs/about/deprecated.rst
> @@ -220,6 +220,17 @@ is a chance the code will bitrot without anyone noticing.
> System emulator machines
> ------------------------
>
> +Versioned machine types older than 6 years
> +''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
> +
> +Starting with the release of QEMU 10.0, versioned machine types older than
> +6 years will automatically be considered as deprecated and might be due to
> +removal without furthor notice. For example, this affects machine types like
> +pc-i440fx-X.Y, pc-q35-X.Y, pseries-X.Y, s390-ccw-virtio-X.Y or virt-X.Y where
> +X is the major number and Y is the minor number of the old QEMU version.
> +If you are still using machine types from QEMU versions older than 6 years,
> +please update your setting to use a newer versioned machine type instead.
> +
> Arm ``virt`` machine ``dtb-kaslr-seed`` property (since 7.1)
> ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
>
> --
> 2.44.0
>
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-30 9:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-30 6:45 [PATCH] docs/about: Automatically deprecate versioned machine types older than 6 years Thomas Huth
2024-04-30 9:32 ` Peter Maydell
2024-04-30 9:40 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-04-30 9:58 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-04-30 10:02 ` Thomas Huth
2024-04-30 9:45 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-04-30 9:58 ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-04-30 9:55 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2024-04-30 10:21 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-04-30 10:29 ` Thomas Huth
2024-04-30 16:54 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZjDAGuONZ_Zem3fL@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=devel@lists.libvirt.org \
--cc=farosas@suse.de \
--cc=laurent@vivier.eu \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).