From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dave@treblig.org>
To: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: "Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Cornelia Huck" <cohuck@redhat.com>,
"David Hildenbrand" <david@redhat.com>,
"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, devel@lists.libvirt.org,
"Eric Farman" <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
"Ilya Leoshkevich" <iii@linux.ibm.com>,
"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
"Eric Blake" <eblake@redhat.com>,
"Halil Pasic" <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
"Anton Johansson" <anjo@rev.ng>, qemu-arm <qemu-arm@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] hw/s390x: Alias @dump-skeys -> @dump-s390-skey and deprecate
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 20:54:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zl4tgFuAdjU2bst6@gallifrey> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zl20rAjHLJlZkwxE@redhat.com>
* Daniel P. Berrangé (berrange@redhat.com) wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 06:47:45AM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > On 30/05/2024 09.45, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > > We are trying to unify all qemu-system-FOO to a single binary.
> > > In order to do that we need to remove QAPI target specific code.
> > >
> > > @dump-skeys is only available on qemu-system-s390x. This series
> > > rename it as @dump-s390-skey, making it available on other
> > > binaries. We take care of backward compatibility via deprecation.
> > >
> > > Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (4):
> > > hw/s390x: Introduce the @dump-s390-skeys QMP command
> > > hw/s390x: Introduce the 'dump_s390_skeys' HMP command
> > > hw/s390x: Deprecate the HMP 'dump_skeys' command
> > > hw/s390x: Deprecate the QMP @dump-skeys command
> >
> > Why do we have to rename the command? Just for the sake of it? I think
> > renaming HMP commands is maybe ok, but breaking the API in QMP is something
> > you should consider twice.
>
> That was going to be my question too. Seems like its possible to simply
> stub out the existing command for other targets.
Are these commands really supposed to be stable, or are they just debug
commands? If they are debug, then add the x- and don't worry too much.
Dave
> The renaming is just window dressing.
>
> >
> > And even if we decide to rename ... maybe we should discuss whether it makes
> > sense to come up with a generic command instead: As far as I know, ARM also
> > has something similar, called MTE. Maybe we also want to dump MTE keys one
> > day? So the new command should maybe be called "dump-memory-keys" instead?
> > Or should it maybe rather be an option to the existing "dump-guest-memory"
> > command instead?
>
> With regards,
> Daniel
> --
> |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
> |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
> |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
>
--
-----Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code -------
/ Dr. David Alan Gilbert | Running GNU/Linux | Happy \
\ dave @ treblig.org | | In Hex /
\ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org |_______/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-03 20:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-30 7:45 [PATCH 0/4] hw/s390x: Alias @dump-skeys -> @dump-s390-skey and deprecate Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-05-30 7:45 ` [PATCH 1/4] hw/s390x: Introduce the @dump-s390-skeys QMP command Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-05-30 7:45 ` [PATCH 2/4] hw/s390x: Introduce the 'dump_s390_skeys' HMP command Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-05-30 7:45 ` [PATCH 3/4] hw/s390x: Deprecate the HMP 'dump_skeys' command Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-05-30 7:45 ` [PATCH 4/4] hw/s390x: Deprecate the QMP @dump-skeys command Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-05-31 4:49 ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-30 8:58 ` [PATCH 0/4] hw/s390x: Alias @dump-skeys -> @dump-s390-skey and deprecate Anton Johansson via
2024-05-31 4:47 ` Thomas Huth
2024-05-31 14:02 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2024-05-31 16:23 ` Thomas Huth
2024-06-03 17:06 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2024-06-03 12:18 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-06-03 20:54 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert [this message]
2024-06-04 4:58 ` Markus Armbruster
2024-06-04 9:45 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-06-04 9:59 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-06-04 10:00 ` Markus Armbruster
2024-06-05 11:44 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2024-06-10 5:20 ` Markus Armbruster
2024-06-27 16:46 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2025-03-09 18:55 ` Pierrick Bouvier
2025-03-10 6:50 ` Thomas Huth
2025-03-10 9:11 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2025-03-10 12:30 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2025-03-09 18:44 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zl4tgFuAdjU2bst6@gallifrey \
--to=dave@treblig.org \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=anjo@rev.ng \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=devel@lists.libvirt.org \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).