From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, <wangxingang5@huawei.com>,
<shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com>, <imammedo@redhat.com>,
<anisinha@redhat.com>, <qemu-arm@nongnu.org>,
<qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] hw/arm/virt-acpi-build: Fix IORT id_count
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 12:04:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZnHaNMNlFjhn5Jjb@Asurada-Nvidia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240618054729-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 05:49:58AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 03:39:45PM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> > The IORT doc defines "Number of IDs" ("id_count" in the virt-acpi-build)
> > to be "the number of IDs in the range minus one". Otherwise, Linux kernel
> > reports "conflicting mapping for input ID" FW_BUG at the overlapped ID.
> >
> > Fixes: 42e0f050e3a5 ("hw/arm/virt-acpi-build: Add IORT support to bypass SMMUv3")
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
> > ---
> > Changelog
> > v2:
> > * Moved "-1" to the same line of id_count calculation
> > * Added "+1" to the next_range.input_base calculation
> > v1:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240613234802.828265-1-nicolinc@nvidia.com/
> >
> > hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c | 9 ++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c b/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
> > index c3ccfef026..631f2c6d04 100644
> > --- a/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
> > +++ b/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
> > @@ -243,7 +243,8 @@ iort_host_bridges(Object *obj, void *opaque)
> >
> > AcpiIortIdMapping idmap = {
> > .input_base = min_bus << 8,
> > - .id_count = (max_bus - min_bus + 1) << 8,
> > + /* id_count is the number of IDs in the range minus one */
> > + .id_count = ((max_bus - min_bus + 1) << 8) - 1,
> > };
> > g_array_append_val(idmap_blob, idmap);
> > }
> > @@ -298,11 +299,13 @@ build_iort(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker, VirtMachineState *vms)
> > idmap = &g_array_index(smmu_idmaps, AcpiIortIdMapping, i);
> >
> > if (next_range.input_base < idmap->input_base) {
> > - next_range.id_count = idmap->input_base - next_range.input_base;
> > + /* id_count is the number of IDs in the range minus one */
> > + next_range.id_count = idmap->input_base -
> > + next_range.input_base - 1;
> > g_array_append_val(its_idmaps, next_range);
>
>
> What about other places where id_count is set?
There are only three places where id_count could be set:
hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c:296: .id_count = ((max_bus - min_bus + 1) << 8) - 1,
hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c:422: next_range.id_count = idmap->input_base -
hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c:435: next_range.id_count = 0xFFFF - next_range.input_base;
This patch fixes two, while the last one is correct using 0xFFFF.
> > }
> >
> > - next_range.input_base = idmap->input_base + idmap->id_count;
> > + next_range.input_base = idmap->input_base + idmap->id_count + 1;
> > }
> >
>
> Given this was different previously, did you actually test with multiple ranges?
Tested by creating 5 buses: input_base increases by 0x400 while
id_count=0x2ff (0x300 - 1). ITS results look correct to me:
--------------build_iort: smmu_idmaps
DEBUG: build_iort_id_mapping: input_base=0xec00, id_count=0x2ff, out_ref=0x48, flags=0
DEBUG: build_iort_id_mapping: input_base=0xf000, id_count=0x2ff, out_ref=0xa0, flags=0
DEBUG: build_iort_id_mapping: input_base=0xf400, id_count=0x2ff, out_ref=0xf8, flags=0
DEBUG: build_iort_id_mapping: input_base=0xf800, id_count=0x2ff, out_ref=0x150, flags=0
DEBUG: build_iort_id_mapping: input_base=0xfc00, id_count=0x2ff, out_ref=0x1a8, flags=0
--------------build_iort: its_idmaps
DEBUG: build_iort_id_mapping: input_base=0x0, id_count=0xebff, out_ref=0x30, flags=0
DEBUG: build_iort_id_mapping: input_base=0xef00, id_count=0xff, out_ref=0x30, flags=0
DEBUG: build_iort_id_mapping: input_base=0xf300, id_count=0xff, out_ref=0x30, flags=0
DEBUG: build_iort_id_mapping: input_base=0xf700, id_count=0xff, out_ref=0x30, flags=0
DEBUG: build_iort_id_mapping: input_base=0xfb00, id_count=0xff, out_ref=0x30, flags=0
DEBUG: build_iort_id_mapping: input_base=0xff00, id_count=0xff, out_ref=0x30, flags=0
Thanks
Nicolin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-18 19:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-17 22:39 [PATCH v2] hw/arm/virt-acpi-build: Fix IORT id_count Nicolin Chen
2024-06-18 9:49 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-06-18 19:04 ` Nicolin Chen [this message]
2024-06-18 19:38 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-06-18 19:57 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-06-18 20:03 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-06-18 20:12 ` Nicolin Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZnHaNMNlFjhn5Jjb@Asurada-Nvidia \
--to=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=anisinha@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com \
--cc=wangxingang5@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).