From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
To: "Eduardo Habkost" <eduardo@habkost.net>,
"Marcel Apfelbaum" <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
"Yanan Wang" <wangyanan55@huawei.com>,
"Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hw/core: Rename CpuTopology to CPUTopology
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 22:49:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZnLwFPb3iLNiC8li@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240527131837.2630961-1-zhao1.liu@intel.com>
Hi maintainers,
Per my communication with Markus, it seems this renaming matches the
"local consistency" principle in (include/hw/boards.h). :-)
So do you think this change is acceptable?
Thanks,
Zhao
On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 09:18:37PM +0800, Zhao Liu wrote:
> Date: Mon, 27 May 2024 21:18:37 +0800
> From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] hw/core: Rename CpuTopology to CPUTopology
> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1
>
> Use CPUTopology to honor the generic style of CPU capitalization
> abbreviations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
> ---
> * Split from the previous SMP cache RFC:
> https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20240220092504.726064-2-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com/
> ---
> hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c | 6 +++---
> include/hw/boards.h | 8 ++++----
> include/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h | 6 +++---
> tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c | 14 +++++++-------
> 4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c b/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c
> index f16bdf65faa0..016f6c1c15ac 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c
> +++ b/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c
> @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ bool s390_has_topology(void)
> */
> static void s390_topology_init(MachineState *ms)
> {
> - CpuTopology *smp = &ms->smp;
> + CPUTopology *smp = &ms->smp;
>
> s390_topology.cores_per_socket = g_new0(uint8_t, smp->sockets *
> smp->books * smp->drawers);
> @@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ void s390_topology_reset(void)
> */
> static bool s390_topology_cpu_default(S390CPU *cpu, Error **errp)
> {
> - CpuTopology *smp = ¤t_machine->smp;
> + CPUTopology *smp = ¤t_machine->smp;
> CPUS390XState *env = &cpu->env;
>
> /* All geometry topology attributes must be set or all unset */
> @@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ static bool s390_topology_check(uint16_t socket_id, uint16_t book_id,
> uint16_t drawer_id, uint16_t entitlement,
> bool dedicated, Error **errp)
> {
> - CpuTopology *smp = ¤t_machine->smp;
> + CPUTopology *smp = ¤t_machine->smp;
>
> if (socket_id >= smp->sockets) {
> error_setg(errp, "Unavailable socket: %d", socket_id);
> diff --git a/include/hw/boards.h b/include/hw/boards.h
> index 2fa800f11ae4..c1737f2a5736 100644
> --- a/include/hw/boards.h
> +++ b/include/hw/boards.h
> @@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ typedef struct DeviceMemoryState {
> } DeviceMemoryState;
>
> /**
> - * CpuTopology:
> + * CPUTopology:
> * @cpus: the number of present logical processors on the machine
> * @drawers: the number of drawers on the machine
> * @books: the number of books in one drawer
> @@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ typedef struct DeviceMemoryState {
> * @threads: the number of threads in one core
> * @max_cpus: the maximum number of logical processors on the machine
> */
> -typedef struct CpuTopology {
> +typedef struct CPUTopology {
> unsigned int cpus;
> unsigned int drawers;
> unsigned int books;
> @@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ typedef struct CpuTopology {
> unsigned int cores;
> unsigned int threads;
> unsigned int max_cpus;
> -} CpuTopology;
> +} CPUTopology;
>
> /**
> * MachineState:
> @@ -409,7 +409,7 @@ struct MachineState {
> const char *cpu_type;
> AccelState *accelerator;
> CPUArchIdList *possible_cpus;
> - CpuTopology smp;
> + CPUTopology smp;
> struct NVDIMMState *nvdimms_state;
> struct NumaState *numa_state;
> };
> diff --git a/include/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h b/include/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h
> index c064f427e948..ff09c57a4428 100644
> --- a/include/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h
> +++ b/include/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h
> @@ -63,17 +63,17 @@ static inline void s390_topology_reset(void)
>
> extern S390Topology s390_topology;
>
> -static inline int s390_std_socket(int n, CpuTopology *smp)
> +static inline int s390_std_socket(int n, CPUTopology *smp)
> {
> return (n / smp->cores) % smp->sockets;
> }
>
> -static inline int s390_std_book(int n, CpuTopology *smp)
> +static inline int s390_std_book(int n, CPUTopology *smp)
> {
> return (n / (smp->cores * smp->sockets)) % smp->books;
> }
>
> -static inline int s390_std_drawer(int n, CpuTopology *smp)
> +static inline int s390_std_drawer(int n, CPUTopology *smp)
> {
> return (n / (smp->cores * smp->sockets * smp->books)) % smp->drawers;
> }
> diff --git a/tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c b/tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c
> index 9fdba24fce56..f51138794ca1 100644
> --- a/tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c
> +++ b/tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c
> @@ -120,8 +120,8 @@
> */
> typedef struct SMPTestData {
> SMPConfiguration config;
> - CpuTopology expect_prefer_sockets;
> - CpuTopology expect_prefer_cores;
> + CPUTopology expect_prefer_sockets;
> + CPUTopology expect_prefer_cores;
> const char *expect_error;
> } SMPTestData;
>
> @@ -643,7 +643,7 @@ static char *smp_config_to_string(const SMPConfiguration *config)
> }
>
> /* Use the different calculation than machine_topo_get_threads_per_socket(). */
> -static unsigned int cpu_topology_get_threads_per_socket(const CpuTopology *topo)
> +static unsigned int cpu_topology_get_threads_per_socket(const CPUTopology *topo)
> {
> /* Check the divisor to avoid invalid topology examples causing SIGFPE. */
> if (!topo->drawers || !topo->books || !topo->sockets) {
> @@ -654,7 +654,7 @@ static unsigned int cpu_topology_get_threads_per_socket(const CpuTopology *topo)
> }
>
> /* Use the different calculation than machine_topo_get_cores_per_socket(). */
> -static unsigned int cpu_topology_get_cores_per_socket(const CpuTopology *topo)
> +static unsigned int cpu_topology_get_cores_per_socket(const CPUTopology *topo)
> {
> /* Check the divisor to avoid invalid topology examples causing SIGFPE. */
> if (!topo->threads) {
> @@ -664,13 +664,13 @@ static unsigned int cpu_topology_get_cores_per_socket(const CpuTopology *topo)
> }
> }
>
> -static char *cpu_topology_to_string(const CpuTopology *topo,
> +static char *cpu_topology_to_string(const CPUTopology *topo,
> unsigned int threads_per_socket,
> unsigned int cores_per_socket,
> bool has_clusters)
> {
> return g_strdup_printf(
> - "(CpuTopology) {\n"
> + "(CPUTopology) {\n"
> " .cpus = %u,\n"
> " .drawers = %u,\n"
> " .books = %u,\n"
> @@ -692,7 +692,7 @@ static char *cpu_topology_to_string(const CpuTopology *topo,
> }
>
> static void check_parse(MachineState *ms, const SMPConfiguration *config,
> - const CpuTopology *expect_topo, const char *expect_err,
> + const CPUTopology *expect_topo, const char *expect_err,
> bool is_valid)
> {
> MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(ms);
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-19 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-27 13:18 [PATCH] hw/core: Rename CpuTopology to CPUTopology Zhao Liu
2024-06-03 11:54 ` Markus Armbruster
2024-06-04 4:15 ` Zhao Liu
2024-06-04 5:29 ` Markus Armbruster
2024-06-04 6:36 ` Zhao Liu
2024-06-04 8:38 ` Markus Armbruster
2024-06-19 14:49 ` Zhao Liu [this message]
2024-06-19 14:53 ` Thomas Huth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZnLwFPb3iLNiC8li@intel.com \
--to=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).